Chaglassian v. Twitter, Inc.
| Veeken Chaglassian |
| Twitter, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv02414 |
| March 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John G Koeltl |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Summons and Complaint served. Twitter, Inc. served on 5/12/2023, answer due 6/2/2023. Service was accepted by Daisy Montenegro at 330 N. Brand Blvd., Ste. 700, Glendale, CA 91203. Document filed by Veeken Chaglassian. (sc) |
Filing 5
ORDER. The Court is in receipt of the pro se plaintiff's letter dated April 12, 2023, which details the plaintiff's difficulty in serving the defendant with the summons and complaint. The plaintiff may seek assistance with serving the defendant with the summons and complaint by calling the Pro Se Intake Office at (212) 805-0175. The Pro Se Intake Unit has provided an information package which is attached to this order. The plaintiff may also seek the assistance of the New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG), whose flyer is also attached to this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 4/25/23) (yv)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Plaintiff Veekan Chaglassian dated 4/12/2023 re: I am writing to you as the plaintiff in this case to bring to your attention the difficulties I am facing in successfully serving the defendant. After two failed attempts through a dedicated process server based in California, Ive come to conclude sending the summons with the backing and sanction of the court via first class mail is the most efficient, surefire, preemptive approach (if not the only option I reasonably have). Further to this, please see point (E) for a detailed proposal. Document filed by Veeken Chaglassian.(tg) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Veeken Chaglassian consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Veeken Chaglassian. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Twitter, Inc. (Filing Fee $402.00, Receipt Number 14194) Document filed by Veeken Chaglassian. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Twitter, Inc. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chaglassian v. Twitter, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Veeken Chaglassian | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Twitter, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
