Johnson v. Clearview AI, Inc. et al
Charles Johnson |
Clearview AI, Inc., Hoan Ton-That and Richard Schwartz |
1:2023cv02441 |
March 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Clearview AI, Inc. waiver sent on 3/27/2023, answer due 5/26/2023; Richard Schwartz waiver sent on 3/27/2023, answer due 5/26/2023; Hoan Ton-That waiver sent on 3/27/2023, answer due 5/26/2023. Document filed by Charles Johnson..(Penaro, Steven) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on June 7, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. The conference will be held telephonically. At the scheduled date and time, the parties are to call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. Initial Conference set for 6/7/2023 at 10:30 AM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 3/24/2023) (rro) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Richard Schwartz. (vf) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Hoan Ton-That. (vf) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Clearview AI, Inc.. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Steven Lawrence Penaro. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand Blank. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to 76,000. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Filing 6 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Charles Johnson..(Penaro, Steven) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Richard Schwartz, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Charles Johnson..(Penaro, Steven) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Hoan Ton-That, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Charles Johnson..(Penaro, Steven) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Clearview AI, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Charles Johnson..(Penaro, Steven) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Penaro, Steven) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Clearview AI, Inc., Richard Schwartz, Hoan Ton-That. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27505774)Document filed by Charles Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Wind-Down Agreement).(Penaro, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.