Walton v. The City of New York et al
| Rashunda Camara Walton |
| THE CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Housing Authority and Chad Lewin |
| 1:2023cv02564 |
| March 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Loretta A Preska |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: #16 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to the complaint to May 26, 2023. addressed to Judge Loretta A. Preska from Renee M. Wong dated May 15, 2023 filed by Chad Lewin. ENDORSEMENT: Upon the consent of all parties, the extension is SO ORDERED., Chad Lewin answer due 5/26/2023; New York City Housing Authority answer due 5/26/2023; The City of New York answer due 5/26/2023. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 5/24/2023) (ama)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER: The Court withdraws the portion of its order, dated May 23, 2023 (dkt. no. 15) directing the Clerk of the Court to mark this action as closed and denying all motions as moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 5/24/2023) (ama)
|
|
Filing 17
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties as represented below, that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii), this action is hereby dismissed, withdrawn and discontinued without prejudice as against the City of New York, and that an order to that effect may be entered without further notice. The Clerk of the court shall mark this action closed and all pending motions denied as moot. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 5/23/2023) (ama)
|
| Filing 16 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to the complaint to May 26, 2023 addressed to Judge Loretta A. Preska from Renee M. Wong dated May 15, 2023. Document filed by Chad Lewin..(Wong, Renee) |
| ***NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Document No. #15 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was reviewed and referred to Judge Loretta A. Preska for approval for the following reason(s): the plaintiff(s) filed their voluntary dismissal and it did not dismiss all of the parties or the action in its entirety. (km) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) The City of New York and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by The City of New York. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Mendez, Ivan) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Renee Melinda Wong on behalf of Chad Lewin..(Wong, Renee) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Ivan Mendez. RE-FILE Document No. #13 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the stipulation of voluntary dismissal was not signed by all parties who have appeared. Re-file the document using the event type Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed (scanned ink signature image) PDF. (tp) |
| Filing 13 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - SIGNATURE ERROR - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) The City of New York and without costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by The City of New York. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Mendez, Ivan) Modified on 4/26/2023 (tp). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ivan A. Mendez, Jr on behalf of The City of New York..(Mendez, Ivan) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER: granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/19/2023) (ama)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: New York City Housing Authority answer due 5/26/2023. (ama) |
| Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge Loretta A. Preska dated 4/18/2023. Document filed by New York City Housing Authority..(Le, Hanh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hanh Le on behalf of New York City Housing Authority..(Le, Hanh) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Service was accepted by sarrah jean charles. Document filed by Rashunda Camara Walton..(Sekendiz, Ismail) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. The City of New York served on 3/30/2023, answer due 4/20/2023. Service was accepted by Sarrah Jean Charles. Service was made by mail. Document filed by Rashunda Camara Walton..(Sekendiz, Ismail) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Chad Lewin served on 3/30/2023, answer due 4/20/2023. Service was accepted by co-worker. Service was made by mail. Document filed by Rashunda Camara Walton..(Sekendiz, Ismail) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. New York City Housing Authority served on 3/30/2023, answer due 4/20/2023. Service was accepted by c stokes. Service was made by mail. Document filed by Rashunda Camara Walton..(Sekendiz, Ismail) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Chad Lewin, New York City Housing Authority, The City of New York. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Ismail Sinan Sekendiz. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Chad Lewin. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party text was omitted. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Loretta A. Preska. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sekendiz, Ismail) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY AND CHAD LEWIN,, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rashunda Camara Walton..(Sekendiz, Ismail) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chad Lewin, New York City Housing Authority, THE CITY OF NEW YORK. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27521271)Document filed by Rashunda Camara Walton..(Sekendiz, Ismail) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
