J.Z. individually, et al v. New York City Department Of Education,
| J.Z. individually, and J.Z. on behalf of minor J.L., |
| New York City Department Of Education, |
| 1:2023cv03077 |
| April 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Mary Kay Vyskocil |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jordan Doll on behalf of New York City Department Of Education,..(Doll, Jordan) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #6 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Marilyn Richter dated May 2, 2023., #1 Complaint. Granted. SO ORDERED. New York City Department Of Education, answer due 6/19/2023. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 5/3/2023) (rro)
|
| Filing 6 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint addressed to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil from Marilyn Richter dated May 2, 2023. Document filed by New York City Department Of Education,..(Richter, Marilyn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Marilyn Richter on behalf of New York City Department Of Education,..(Richter, Marilyn) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to New York City Department Of Education. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Noelle Boostani. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: New York City Department of Education. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly. (vf) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to New York City Department of Education, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by J.Z. individually,, J.Z. on behalf of minor J.L.,..(Boostani, Noelle) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Boostani, Noelle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York City Department Of Education,. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27599994)Document filed by J.Z. individually,, J.Z. on behalf of minor J.L.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit PO 200941 9-28-21, #2 Exhibit Nonimplementation LV Notice 12-22-22, #3 Exhibit Service Receipt of Records for 200941, #4 Exhibit FOFD 217614, #5 Exhibit Service Receipt of Records 217614, #6 Exhibit FOFD 237671, #7 Exhibit Service Receipt of Records 237671).(Boostani, Noelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
