Brown v. Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc.
Lamar Brown |
Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc. |
1:2023cv03298 |
April 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Analisa Torres |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #11 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Michael F. Fleming dated May 30, 2023. GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 5/31/2023) (jca) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc. answer due 6/29/2023. (jca) |
Filing 11 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Michael F. Fleming dated May 30, 2023. Document filed by Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc...(Fleming, Michael) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Friel Fleming on behalf of Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc...(Fleming, Michael) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Douglas T. Schwarz on behalf of Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc...(Schwarz, Douglas) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc. served on 5/9/2023, answer due 5/30/2023. Service was accepted by Megan Ledwith. Document filed by Lamar Brown..(Khaimov, Mars) |
Filing 7 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by June 23, 2023, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/24/2023) (kv) |
Filing 6 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/24/2023) (kv) |
Filing 5 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (as further set forth herein). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/24/2023) (kv) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc.. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Lamar Brown..(Khaimov, Mars) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Khaimov, Mars) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27632182)Document filed by Lamar Brown..(Khaimov, Mars) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brown v. Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lamar Brown | |
Represented By: | Mars Khaimov |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Douglas T. Schwarz |
Represented By: | Michael Friel Fleming |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.