Matzura v. Auralex Acoustics, Inc.
| Steven Matzura |
| Auralex Acoustics, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv03557 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Jennifer L Rochon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Auralex Acoustics, Inc...(Lynett, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph James Lynett on behalf of Auralex Acoustics, Inc...(Lynett, Joseph) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon from Joseph J. Lynett dated 06/05/2023. Request GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to July 7, 2023. The parties are reminded that the joint letter required by ECF No. 6 is due July 5, 2023. SO ORDERED. Auralex Acoustics, Inc. answer due 7/7/2023 (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 6/5/2023) (jca)
|
| Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon from Joseph J. Lynett dated 06/05/2023. Document filed by Auralex Acoustics, Inc...(Lynett, Joseph) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Auralex Acoustics, Inc. served on 5/18/2023, answer due 6/8/2023. Service was accepted by Noah McCormick, Authorized Agent. Document filed by Steven Matzura..(LaBollita, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of service of the summons and complaint, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. In their discussions, the parties should consider whether Plaintiff has satisfied thethreshold requirement of standing. See, e.g., Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd., 36 F.4th 68, 77-78 (2d Cir. 2022); Harty v. W. Point Realty, Inc., 28 F.4th 435, 443-44 (2d Cir. 2022). To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the districts court-annexed mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fifteen (15) additional days (i.e., within forty-five (45) days of service of the summons and complaint), the parties must submit a joint letter informing the Court whether the parties have settled. If the parties do not reach a settlement, the parties shall in the joint letter request that the Court (1) refer the case to mediation or a magistrate judge for a settlement conference (and indicate a preference between the two options), or (2) proceed with an initial status conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Rochon on 5/1/23) (yv)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb on behalf of Steven Matzura..(Gottlieb, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Auralex Acoustics, Inc...(jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Rochon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(LaBollita, Michael) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Auralex Acoustics, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Steven Matzura..(LaBollita, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Auralex Acoustics, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27668320)Document filed by Steven Matzura..(LaBollita, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Matzura v. Auralex Acoustics, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Matzura | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. LaBollita |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Michael Gottlieb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Auralex Acoustics, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph James Lynett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
