Samuels v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
| Monique Samuels |
| JP Morgan Chase & Company and JP Morgan Chase & Co. |
| 1:2023cv03590 |
| April 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis J Liman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 9/28/2023 at 03:00 PM before Judge Lewis J. Liman. Parties are directed to dial into the Court's teleconference number at 888-251-2909, Access Code 2123101, and follow the necessary prompts. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis J. Liman on 6/22/2023) (vfr)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Shira M. Blank dated June 6, 2023.. All Defendants (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Lewis J. Liman)(Text Only Order) (Liman, Lewis)
|
| Filing 7 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman from Shira M. Blank dated June 6, 2023. Document filed by JP Morgan Chase & Co...(Blank, Shira) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Keys on behalf of JP Morgan Chase & Co...(Keys, Anthony) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Shira M. Blank on behalf of JP Morgan Chase & Co...(Blank, Shira) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to JP Morgan Chase & Co...(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Corey Scott Stark. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Rockland;. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Corey Scott Stark. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: JP Morgan Chase & Company. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error;. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lewis J. Liman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Stark, Corey) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to JP Morgan Chase & Co., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Monique Samuels..(Stark, Corey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JP Morgan Chase & Company. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27673670)Document filed by Monique Samuels..(Stark, Corey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
