The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Rael Maintenance Corp.
The Cincinnati Insurance Company |
Rael Maintenance Corp. |
1:2023cv04462 |
May 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Gregory H Woods |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pd Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER: Defendant's July 12, 2023 request to adjourn the initial pretrial conference, Dkt. No. 10, is granted. The initial pretrial conference scheduled for August 4, 2023, is adjourned to October 12,2023, at 4:00 p.m. The joint status letter and proposed case management plan described in the Court's June 2, 2023 order are due no later than October 5, 2023. Counsel for Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order on counsel for Defendant and to retain proof of service. Counsel for Defendant is directed to enter an appearance forthwith. If counsel for Defendant wishes to make any further filings in this case, they must first enter a notice of appearance. SO ORDERED. Initial Conference set for 10/12/2023 at 04:00 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/12/2023) (jca) Modified on 7/13/2023 (jca). |
Filing 10 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Anne E. Armstrong, Esq. dated 07/12/2023 re: The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Rael Maintenance Corp.. Document filed by Rael Maintenance Corp...(Armstrong, Anne) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Rael Maintenance Corp. waiver sent on 6/1/2023, answer due 7/31/2023. Document filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company..(Matz, George) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: The conference will be conducted by telephone. The parties are directed to the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases, which are available on the Court's website. Rule 2 of the Court's Individual Rules contains the dial-in number for the conference and other relevant instructions. The parties are specifically directed to comply with Rule 2(B) of the Court's Individual Rules. Initial Conference set for 8/4/2023 at 04:00 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/2/2023) (rro) |
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:23-cv-04433-GHW. Notice of Assignment to follow. (vba) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Gregory H. Woods. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vba) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Rael Maintenance Corp...(pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney George J Matz. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $766,000,000; County code New York;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $766,000; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (pc) |
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Gregory H. Woods as possibly related to 23cv4433. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(pc) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Rael Maintenance Corp., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company..(Matz, George) |
Filing 5 RELATED CASE AFFIRMATION re: that this action be filed as related to 1:23-cv-04433. Document filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company..(Matz, George) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent The Cincinnati Financial Corporation for The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Document filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company..(Matz, George) |
Filing 3 FILING ERROR -- DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MISSING DIVERSITY INFORMATION - (SEE DOCUMENT #4) - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent The Cincinnati Financial Corporation for The Cincinnati Insurance Company. Document filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company..(Matz, George) Modified on 5/31/2023 (lb). |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Matz, George) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rael Maintenance Corp.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27798992)Document filed by The Cincinnati Insurance Company..(Matz, George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Rael Maintenance Corp. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: The Cincinnati Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | George J Matz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rael Maintenance Corp. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.