Song v. Columbia University et al
| Eugenia Song |
| Columbia University and Peter Coleman |
| 1:2023cv04532 |
| May 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
CIVIL JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the July 27, 2023, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/27/23) (Attachments: #1 PRO SE APPEAL PACKAGE) (rdz)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: By order dated June 1, 2023, the Court directed Plaintiff to either pay the $402.00 in fees that are required to file a civil action in this court or to proceed without prepayment of the filing fees submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") within thirty days. On July 6, 2023, the order was returned to the Court with a notation on the envelope indicating that the address was insufficient, and the mail was undeliverable to that address. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court's order, has failed to notify the Court of a change of mailing address, and has not initiated any further contact with the Court, written or otherwise. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint, filed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1), is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915.The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 7/27/23) (rdz)
|
| Received returned mail re: #3 Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application. Mail was addressed to Eugenia Son, 2802 Autumn Creek Trail, Ft. Worth, TX 76134 and was returned for the following reason(s): Return To Sender Insufficient Address Unable To Forward Return To Sender. (vn) Modified on 7/13/2023 (vn). |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: Eugenia Song 2802 Autumn Creek Trail Ft. Worth, TX 76134. (sha) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR IFP APPLICATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 7/3/2023. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 7/3/2023. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 6/1/2023) (sha)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(rdz) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Peter Coleman, Columbia University. Document filed by Eugenia Song. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
