Bushansky v. Arconic Corporation et al
| Stephen Bushansky |
| Arconic Corporation, William F. Austen, Christopher L. Ayers, Margaret S. Billson, Jacques Croisetiere, Elmer L. Doty, Carol S. Eicher, Frederick A. Henderson, Ellis A. Jones, Timothy D. Myers, E. Stanley ONeal and Jeffrey Stafeil |
| 1:2023cv05167 |
| June 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Valerie E Caproni |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to CLOSE all cases in this consolidated action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 7/31/23) (yv)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to CLOSE the cases numbered 23-CV-4971 and 23-CV-5091. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, not later than July 27, 2023, Plaintiffs must show cause why the remaining cases should not be dismissed or file a notice of voluntary dismissal as to the remaining cases. Plaintiffs are encouraged to file their responses jointly to the extent possible. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 7/25/2023) (vfr)
|
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Gloria Melwani regarding Document No. 8 belonging to case 23cv4971 that was incorrectly filed on 7/19/2023 in case 23cv5167. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the voluntary dismissal was filed in the wrong case. (km) |
| Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) Arconic Corporation, William F. Austen, Christopher L. Ayers, Margaret S. Billson, Jacques Croisetiere, Elmer L. Doty, Carol S. Eicher, Frederick A. Henderson, Ellis A. Jones, Timothy D. Myers, E. Stanley O'Neal, Jeffrey Stafeil, Robert Williams. Document filed by Ryan O'Dell. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers).. Filed In Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-04971-VEC et al..(Melwani, Gloria) Modified on 7/20/2023 (km). |
|
Filing 7
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (6 in 1:23-cv-05167-VEC) Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Stephen Bushansky, (5 in 1:23-cv-05235-VEC) Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Robert Williams, (6 in 1:23-cv-05091-VEC) Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Elaine Wang, (5 in 1:23-cv-04971-VEC) Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Ryan O'Dell, (6 in 1:23-cv-05313-VEC) Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Zahava Rosenfeld. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to consolidate the cases numbered 23-cv-4971, 23-cv-5091, 23-cv-5167, 23-cv-5235, 23-cv-5313, and 23-cv-5461, and to designate 23-cv-4971 as the lead case. All further submissions in this now-consolidated case must be filed under docket number 23-cv-4971. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 7/12/2023) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-04971-VEC et al. (tg)
|
| Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #4 Order to Show Cause,. Document filed by Stephen Bushansky..(Rogovin, Michael) |
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Stephen Bushansky..(Rogovin, Michael) |
| CONSOLIDATED MEMBER CASE: Create association to 1:23-cv-04971-VEC.. (tg) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than July 12, 2023, the parties in all matters must show cause why these two cases should not be consolidated pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42. The parties are encouraged to file joint responses to the extent possible. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 7/6/2023) (tg)
|
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sgz) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:23-cv-04971-VEC. Notice of Assignment to follow. (sgz) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sgz) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge Valerie E. Caproni as possibly related to 1:23cv4971. (sj) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:23-cv-04971-VEC. Document filed by Stephen Bushansky..(Rogovin, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Addendum to Civil Cover Sheet).(Rogovin, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arconic Corporation, Carol S. Eicher, Christopher L. Ayers, E. Stanley ONeal, Ellis A. Jones, Elmer L. Doty, Frederick A. Henderson, Jacques Croisetiere, Jeffrey Stafeil, Margaret S. Billson, Timothy D. Myers, William F. Austen. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-27889709)Document filed by Stephen Bushansky..(Rogovin, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
