Ramani v. Youtube, LLC
Plaintiff: Valmiki Ramani
Defendant: Youtube, LLC
Case Number: 1:2023cv06064
Filed: July 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Katherine Polk Failla
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2023 Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Northern District of California acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 4:23-cv-03787, filed on 07/28/2023. (sac)
July 24, 2023 MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 12,13. Mailed to: Valmiki Ramani 13905 85th Drive Apartment 6D Briarwood, NY 11435. (ok)
July 21, 2023 CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Northern District of California.(rro)
July 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER denying as moot #11 Letter Motion for Conference re: #11 LETTER MOTION for Conference [Defendant YouTube, LLC respectfully requests a pre-motion conference so that YouTube may move to (a) transfer these cases to the Northern District of California, or, in the alternative, (b) dismiss them due to claim. Application DENIED. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's letter requesting a premotion conference on its anticipated motion to transfer or in the alternative dismiss (Dkt. #11) and Plaintiff's letter setting forth various objections (Dkt. #10). In light of the Court's Order transferring this case to the Northern District of California (Dkt. #12), the premotion conference request and related objections are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket number 11. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this endorsement to Plaintiff at his address of record. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/21/2023) (rro)
July 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at his address of record. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/21/2023) (rro) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing.
July 20, 2023 Filing 11 LETTER MOTION for Conference [Defendant YouTube, LLC respectfully requests a pre-motion conference so that YouTube may move to (a) transfer these cases to the Northern District of California, or, in the alternative, (b) dismiss them due to claim preclusion and/or for failure to state a claim] addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Jason Mollick dated July 20, 2023. Document filed by Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason)
July 19, 2023 Filing 10 LETTER from V. Ramani, re: OBJECTIONS TO REMOVAL OF THIS CASE FROM THE STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT. Document filed by Valmiki Ramani.(sc)
July 17, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 23-100209..Document filed by Youtube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Part 1 of 3) - Summons and Complaint for the First State Court Action, #2 Exhibit A (Part 2 of 3) - Summons and Complaint for the First State Court Action, #3 Exhibit A (Part 3 of 3) - Summons and Complaint for the First State Court Action, #4 Exhibit B - Order denying IFP status, #5 Exhibit C (Part 1 of 2) - Summons and Complaint for the Second State Court Action, #6 Exhibit C (Part 2 of 2) - Summons and Complaint for the Second State Court Action, #7 Exhibit D - Order granting Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis in the Second State Court Action).(Mollick, Jason)
July 17, 2023 Case Designated ECF. (sj)
July 17, 2023 Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)
July 17, 2023 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)
July 17, 2023 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Jason Blake Mollick to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Notice of Removal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Pursuant to ECF Filing Rule 13.3, Notice of Removal exhibits must be filed as attachments and labeled. Each attachment must be clearly titled in the ECF entry so the subject of the exhibit is clear. They cannot be labeled "Exhibit A, Exhibit B, etc.". Re-file the pleading using the event type Notice of Removal found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (sj)
July 14, 2023 Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Alphabet Inc., Other Affiliate XXVI Holdings Inc., Other Affiliate Google LLC for Youtube, LLC. Document filed by Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason)
July 14, 2023 Filing 6 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 23-cv-6071. Document filed by Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason)
July 14, 2023 Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mollick, Jason)
July 14, 2023 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of NOTICE OF REMOVAL etc. served on Plaintiff Valmiki Ramani on July 14, 2023. Service was made by FedEx. Document filed by Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason)
July 14, 2023 Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MISSING DIVERSITY INFORMATION - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Alphabet Inc., Other Affiliate XXVI Holdings Inc., Other Affiliate Google LLC for Youtube, LLC. Document filed by Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason) Modified on 7/14/2023 (kj).
July 14, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jason Blake Mollick on behalf of Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason)
July 14, 2023 Filing 1 FILING ERROR - EXHIBITS NOT CLEARLY TITLED NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 23-100209. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28000387).Document filed by Youtube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Part 1 of 3), #2 Exhibit A (Part 2 of 3), #3 Exhibit A (Part 3 of 3), #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C (Part 1 of 2), #6 Exhibit C (Part 2 of 2), #7 Exhibit D).(Mollick, Jason) Modified on 7/17/2023 (sj).
July 14, 2023 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney Jason Mollick to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the jurisdiction of this action is based on diversity - the party/intervenor did not name and identify the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. Re-file the document using the event type Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct signed PDF - when prompted with the message "Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?", select the Yes or No radio button - If Yes - enter the corporate parent/other affiliate, click the Search button - select the correct corporate parent/other affiliate name from the search results list or if no person found, create a new corporate parent/other affiliate - select the party to whom the corporate parent/other affiliate should be linked - add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time - name and identify the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. Please use the revised form found on the NYSD form page. (kj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramani v. Youtube, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Valmiki Ramani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Youtube, LLC
Represented By: Jason Blake Mollick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?