Ramani v. Youtube, LLC
Valmiki Ramani |
Youtube, LLC |
1:2023cv06071 |
July 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Northern District of California acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 4:23-cv-03788, filed on 07/28/2023. (sac) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 10,11. Mailed to: Valmiki Ramani 13905 85th Drive Apartment 6D Briarwood, NY 11435. (ok) |
CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Northern District of California.(rro) |
Filing 11 ORDER denying as moot #9 Letter Motion for Conference re: #9 LETTER MOTION for Conference [Defendant YouTube, LLC respectfully requests a pre-motion conference so that YouTube may move to (a) transfer these cases to the Northern District of California, or, in the alternative, (b) dismiss them due to claim. Application DENIED. In light of the Court's Order transferring this case to the Northern District of California (Dkt. # 10), Defendant's request for a premotion conference is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket number 9. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this endorsement to Plaintiff at his address of record.. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/21/2023) (rro) |
Filing 10 ORDER:The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed further without prepayment of fees is a determination to be made by the transferee court. A summons shall not issue from this Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case. The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at his address of record. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/21/2023) (rro) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. |
Filing 9 LETTER MOTION for Conference [Defendant YouTube, LLC respectfully requests a pre-motion conference so that YouTube may move to (a) transfer these cases to the Northern District of California, or, in the alternative, (b) dismiss them due to claim preclusion and/or for failure to state a claim] addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Jason Mollick dated July 20, 2023. Document filed by Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason) |
CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:23-cv-06064-KPF. Notice of Assignment to follow. (sgz) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sgz) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sgz) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 23-100256..Document filed by Youtube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Part 1 of 3) - Summons and Complaint for the First State Court Action, #2 Exhibit A (Part 2 of 3) - Summons and Complaint for the First State Court Action, #3 Exhibit A (Part 3 of 3) - Summons and Complaint for the First State Court Action, #4 Exhibit B - Order denying IFP status, #5 Exhibit C (Part 1 of 2) - Summons and Complaint for the Second State Court Action, #6 Exhibit C (Part 2 of 2) - Summons and Complaint for the Second State Court Action, #7 Exhibit D - Order granting Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis in the Second State Court Action).(Mollick, Jason) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Jason Blake Mollick to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Notice of Removal,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Pursuant to ECF Filing Rule 13.3, Notice of Removal exhibits must be filed as attachments and labeled. Each attachment must be clearly titled in the ECF entry so the subject of the exhibit is clear. They cannot be labeled "Exhibit A, Exhibit B, etc.". Re-file the pleading using the event type Notice of Removal found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (pc) |
CASE REFERRED TO Judge Katherine Polk Failla as possibly related to 23cv6064. (pc) |
Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Jason Blake Mollick. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Valmiki Ramani. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (pc) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(pc) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Jason Blake Mollick. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Queens;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State;. (pc) |
Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Alphabet Inc., Other Affiliate XXVI Holdings Inc., Other Affiliate Google LLC for Youtube, LLC. Document filed by Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of NOTICE OF REMOVAL etc. served on Plaintiff Valmiki Ramani on July 14, 2023. Service was made by FedEx. Document filed by Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason) |
Filing 5 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 23-cv-6064. Document filed by Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mollick, Jason) |
Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MISSING DIVERSITY INFORMATION - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Alphabet Inc., Other Affiliate XXVI Holdings Inc., Other Affiliate Google LLC for Youtube, LLC. Document filed by Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason) Modified on 7/14/2023 (kj). |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jason Blake Mollick on behalf of Youtube, LLC..(Mollick, Jason) |
Filing 1 FILING ERROR - EXHIBITS NOT CLEARLY TITLEDNOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 23-100256. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28001156).Document filed by Youtube, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Part 1 of 3), #2 Exhibit A (Part 2 of 3), #3 Exhibit A (Part 3 of 3), #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C (Part 1 of 2), #6 Exhibit C (Part 2 of 2), #7 Exhibit D).(Mollick, Jason) Modified on 7/17/2023 (pc). |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney Jason Mollick to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the jurisdiction of this action is based on diversity - the party/intervenor did not name and identify the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. Re-file the document using the event type Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct signed PDF - when prompted with the message "Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?", select the Yes or No radio button - If Yes - enter the corporate parent/other affiliate, click the Search button - select the correct corporate parent/other affiliate name from the search results list or if no person found, create a new corporate parent/other affiliate - select the party to whom the corporate parent/other affiliate should be linked - add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time - name and identify the citizenship of every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to that party or intervenor. Please use the revised form found on the NYSD form page. (kj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ramani v. Youtube, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Valmiki Ramani | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Youtube, LLC | |
Represented By: | Jason Blake Mollick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.