Ricardo v. The Segal Group, Inc. et al
| DiBartolo Ricardo |
| The Segal Group, Inc. and David Blumenstein |
| 1:2023cv06095 |
| July 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jennifer H Rearden |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
STIPULATION EXTENDING TO TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel, that: 1. Defendants' time to answer move or otherwise respond to the complaint in the above-captioned action shall be extended to and including October 5, 2023; and 2. The summons and complaint are deemed served upon all defendants and all defenses, except objections to improper service, are preserved. SO ORDERED. David Blumenstein answer due 10/5/2023; The Segal Group, Inc. answer due 10/5/2023., Motions terminated: #4 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Jennifer H. Rearden from Christine L. Hogan dated August 8, 2023 filed by DiBartolo Ricardo. (Signed by Judge Jennifer H. Rearden on 8/10/2023) (vfr)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Jennifer H. Rearden from Christine L. Hogan dated August 8, 2023. Document filed by DiBartolo Ricardo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer).(Hogan, Christine) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Hogan, Christine) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jennifer H. Rearden. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Christine Lee Hogan re: Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF ( add missing defendants in their official capacities). Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents. (gp) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Christine Lee Hogan to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): The Citizenship of Principle Parties section on the PDF has multiple selections for the Defendant. Place an X in Citizenship of Principle Parties box for the Defendant and refile. (gp) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Hogan, Christine) Modified on 7/17/2023 (gp). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Blumenstein, The Segal Group, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28004601)Document filed by DiBartolo Ricardo..(Hogan, Christine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
