Figueroa v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Carlos Luis Figueroa |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2023cv06455 |
| July 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Katharine H Parker |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Commissioner of Social Security, Carlos Luis Figueroa. (Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge) CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 8/15/2023).(rro) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Commissioner of Social Security..(Gandhi, Avni) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Avni Dinesh Gandhi on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security..(Gandhi, Avni) |
Filing 7
ORDER: This case has been referred to me for a report and recommendation. The parties shall meet and confer to discuss whether they jointly consent to decision of this action by a United States Magistrate Judge (that is, the undersigned), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). If the parties jointly consent, they shall complete the consent form available on the Court's website at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/consent-to-proceed-before-us-magistrate-judge and return the form to the Clerk of the Court. If either or both parties do not consent, counsel for Plaintiff shall file a letter on ECF no later than Friday, October 6, 2023 representing that the parties met and conferred but that they do not jointly consent. The letter should not indicate any particular partys consent or non-consent. This Order is not meant to interfere in any way with the parties' absolute right to decision by a United States District Judge but is merely an attempt at preserving scarce judicial resources and reminding the parties of their option pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). There will be no adverse consequences if the parties withhold their consent, but granting consent may result in a faster and more efficient resolution of this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 8/7/2023) (vfr)
|
| NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACTION. The Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York are hereby notified of the commencement of this action. Electronic Certified Administrative Record due by 9/29/2023..(jgo) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 7/28/2023) (kv)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 7/28/2023) (ama)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER IN RE BRIEFING OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 22-MISC-329 Standing Order filed November 21, 2022). WHEREAS, cases filed on and after December 1, 2022 under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), seeking judicial review on the record of final decisions by the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying applications for social security benefits, are governed by the simplified procedures set forth in the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions ("Supplemental Rules" or "Supp. R.");... in order to ensure the efficient disposition of cases subject to the Supplemental Rules, it is hereby ORDERED that, prior to seeking an extension of any deadline set forth in Supp. R. 4, 6, 7, or 8, the party seeking such extension shall attempt to meet and confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to agree upon a reasonable and comprehensive schedule for all future filings in the case. If the parties reach agreement, the proposed schedule shall be presented to the Court for approval and, if approved, will govern all remaining proceedings in the case.... (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/18/2022) (jgo)
|
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Carlos Luis Figueroa..(Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Olinsky, Howard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Carlos Luis Figueroa. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action).(Olinsky, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
