Pena v. 9-15 Post Holding LLC et al
Miguel Pena |
9-15 Post Holding LLC and Barberry Rose Management, Inc. |
Elio&Sons2 LLC |
1:2023cv06629 |
July 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Valerie E Caproni |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with JURY DEMAND., CROSSCLAIM against 9-15 Post Holding LLC, Barberry Rose Management, Inc.. Document filed by Elio&Sons2 LLC..(Kreger, Wayne) |
Filing 13 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Elio&Sons2 LLC..(Kreger, Wayne) |
NOTICE OF MEDIATOR ASSIGNMENT - Notice of assignment of mediator. Mediator Schedule due by 10/10/2023.(sge) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint. Document filed by 9-15 Post Holding LLC, Barberry Rose Management, Inc...(Pischl, Stephen) |
Filing 11 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by 9-15 Post Holding LLC, Barberry Rose Management, Inc...(Pischl, Stephen) |
![]() |
![]() |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 10/2/2023. (tg) |
Filing 8 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint in this Matter, Nunc Pro Tunc, on Consent addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Stephen P. Pischl dated September 5, 2023. Document filed by 9-15 Post Holding LLC, Barberry Rose Management, Inc...(Pischl, Stephen) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephen Paul Pischl on behalf of 9-15 Post Holding LLC, Barberry Rose Management, Inc...(Pischl, Stephen) |
![]() |
Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. 9-15 Post Holding LLC served on 8/2/2023, answer due 8/23/2023; Barberry Rose Management, Inc. served on 8/2/2023, answer due 8/23/2023; Elio&Sons2 LLC served on 8/2/2023, answer due 8/23/2023. Service was accepted by New York Secretary of State. Document filed by Miguel Pena..(Hassan, Abdul) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to 9-15 Post Holding LLC, Barberry Rose Management, Inc., Elio&Sons2 LLC..(jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Valerie E. Caproni. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Hassan, Abdul) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to 9-15 Post Holding LLC, Barberry Rose Management, Inc., Elio&Sons2 LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Miguel Pena..(Hassan, Abdul) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 9-15 Post Holding LLC, Barberry Rose Management, Inc., Elio&Sons2 LLC. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28073454)Document filed by Miguel Pena..(Hassan, Abdul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.