Jones v. Annucci et al
| Daniel Jones |
| Commissioner Anthony Annucci, Sergeant Joseph and John Doe |
| 1:2023cv06917 |
| August 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 5. Mailed to: Daniel Jones DIN:16B3768 354 Hunter Street Ossining, NY 10562. (ta) |
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE: Plaintiff is directed to submit a signed signature page to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Signature Page due by 9/8/2023. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/9/23) (aan)
|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 1, 4. Mailed to: Daniel Jones DIN:16B3768 354 Hunter Street Ossining, NY 10562. (ta) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION & PRISONER AUTHORIZATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the filing fee or submit an IFP application & Prisoner Authorization to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 9/7/2023. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 9/7/2023. Prisoner Authorization Form due by 9/7/2023. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/8/23) (aan)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (dsh) |
| Filing 3 MOTION re: for Appointment of Counsel. Document filed by Daniel Jones. (sac) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Anthony Annucci, John Doe, John Doe, Joseph. Document filed by Daniel Jones. (sac) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER: The Clerk of Court is further directed to open separate civil actions with new docket numbers for Carlos Arriago, Terrence Turner, David Louime, Dennis Antwon, Robert Campbell, Gregory White, Shantee Brooks, Eligidio Lind, Teddy Williams, Hector L. DeJesus, Apolinar Roque, Ricardo Corbin, Terel Overton, Alex Martinez, Deshard Wright, Clayton Scott, Michael A. Crane, Kevin Bussey, Eric Pek, Vaughn Campbell, Ivan T. Ramos, Daniel Jones, Dwayne Reed, Ivan Seabrooks, James Scott, Alen Haymon, Alfonso A. Howard, Stephen Robinson, and Trevor Price. A copy of the complaint (ECF No. 1), the motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 4), and this order should be docketed in each new case. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/7/2023) (sac)
|
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
