Nobile v. Borack Obama Administration
| Ms. Natacha Nobile |
| Borack Obama Administration |
| 1:2023cv07417 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 6-7. Mailed to: Natacha Nobile 151-30 20th Avenue Whitestone, NY 11357. (sha) |
Filing 7
CIVIL JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the October 10, 2023, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/10/2023) (Attachments: #1 Pro Se Appeal Package) (sac)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The Court dismisses the complaint as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/10/2023) (sac)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER from Ms. N. Nobile dated 10/2/23 re: This is a letter to show the crimes of Joe Biden, Donald Trump and Barack Obama in these crimes of heist, and about death threats and fraud with terrorism with Delta and United Airlines etc. Document filed by Natacha Nobile.(sc) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (sac) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Natacha Nobile 151-30 20th Avenue Whitestone, NY 11357. (sha) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/23/2023) (sha)
|
| Filing 3 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Natacha Nobile consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Natacha Nobile..(rdz) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Natacha Nobile..(rdz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Borack Obama Administration. Document filed by Natacha Nobile..(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nobile v. Borack Obama Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ms. Natacha Nobile | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Borack Obama Administration | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
