Lewis et al v. City of New York
| KELLY LEWIS, individually and as proposed Administrator of the Estate of EMANUEL DEVINE SULLIVAN and Kelly Lewis |
| THE CITY OF NEW YORK and City of New York |
| 1:2023cv07594 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER SCHEDULING AN INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: If the parties fail to agree upon such a plan or fail to submit the plan to the Court within the time provided (at least two business days before the conference date), the parties must participate in a telephone conference on 11/30/2023 at 10:00 a.m. Parties should dial in at 1(888)363-4749, access code (9054506) to join the conference. As further set forth by this Order. Initial Conference set for 11/30/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Colleen McMahon. (Signed by Judge Colleen McMahon on 9/6/2023) (tg)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of New York..(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Robert Howard Rickner. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: KELLY LEWIS; THE CITY OF NEW YORK. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party name was entered in all caps;. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Colleen McMahon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Robert Howard Rickner re: Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF; add Kelly Lewis with party text 'as proposed Administrator of the Estate of Emanuel Devine Sullivan'. Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents... (jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to THE CITY OF NEW YORK, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by KELLY LEWIS, individually and as proposed Administrator of the Estate of EMANUEL DEVINE SULLIVAN..(Rickner, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rickner, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE CITY OF NEW YORK. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28201694)Document filed by KELLY LEWIS, individually and as proposed Administrator of the Estate of EMANUEL DEVINE SULLIVAN..(Rickner, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
