Crosbie v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Philecia Kerrie Crosbie
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 1:2023cv07890
Filed: September 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Barbara C Moses
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The parties have now consented to this Court's jurisdiction for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (Dkt. 8.) Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees (see Dkt. 3) is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Commissioner has advised the Court that the notice of electronic filing that ordinarily triggers the 60-day period for service of the answer was not timely transmitted. (See Dkt. 7.) Consequently, the answer must be filed no later than 60 days from today. Thereafter, the parties must comply with Standing Order M-10-468 (Dkt. 4). (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 10/11/2023) (rro)
October 10, 2023 Filing 8 CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Commissioner of Social Security, Philecia Kerrie Crosbie, Social Security Administration. (Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge) CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 10/10/2023).(tg)
October 10, 2023 Filing 7 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses from Jonathan King dated October 10, 2023 re: Answer Deadline. Document filed by Commissioner of Social Security..(King, Jonathan)
October 2, 2023 Filing 6 PROPOSED CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Commissioner of Social Security..(King, Jonathan)
September 19, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jonathan King on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security..(King, Jonathan)
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE BRIEFING OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 22-MISC-329 Standing Order filed November 21, 2022). WHEREAS, cases filed on and after December 1, 2022 under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), seeking judicial review on the record of final decisions by the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying applications for social security benefits, are governed by the simplified procedures set forth in the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions ("Supplemental Rules" or "Supp. R.");... in order to ensure the efficient disposition of cases subject to the Supplemental Rules, it is hereby ORDERED that, prior to seeking an extension of any deadline set forth in Supp. R. 4, 6, 7, or 8, the party seeking such extension shall attempt to meet and confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to agree upon a reasonable and comprehensive schedule for all future filings in the case. If the parties reach agreement, the proposed schedule shall be presented to the Court for approval and, if approved, will govern all remaining proceedings in the case.... (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/18/2022) (jgo)
September 7, 2023 Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
September 7, 2023 Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
September 7, 2023 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
September 6, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis . Document filed by Philecia Kerrie Crosbie..(Osborn, Daniel)
September 6, 2023 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Osborn, Daniel)
September 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. Document filed by Philecia Kerrie Crosbie..(Osborn, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crosbie v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Philecia Kerrie Crosbie
Represented By: Daniel Adam Osborn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Jonathan King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?