Remy v. State of New York et al
| Linda Remy |
| State of New York, Workers' Compensation Board, John Does 1-100 and State of New York Workers Compensation Board |
| 1:2023cv07933 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION(AFFIRMATION of Linda Remy) TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Document filed by Linda Remy. (sc) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 9. Mailed to: Linda Remy 2 Jordan Place Hillcrest, NY 10977. (sha) |
Filing 9
MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: #7 Letter filed by State of New York Workers Compensation Board. ENDORSEMENT: A pre-motion conference will be held on November 2, 2023 at 2:30 p.m. by telephone. Plaintiff is directed to respond by October 26, 2023. The parties are instructed to call (877) 411-9748 and enter access code 3029857# when prompted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 10/16/2023) (ama)
|
| Set/Reset Hearings: Telephonic Pre-Motion Conference set for 11/2/2023 at 02:30 PM before Judge Edgardo Ramos. (ama) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Marjorie S. Leff on behalf of State of New York Workers Compensation Board..(Leff, Marjorie) |
| Filing 7 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Marjorie S. Leff dated October 12, 2023 re: pre-motion conference request. Document filed by State of New York Workers Compensation Board..(Leff, Marjorie) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 6. Mailed to: Linda Remy 2 Jordan Place Hillcrest, NY 10977. (sha) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Marjorie S. Leff dated 09/27/2023. The request for an extension of time to respond to the complaint, until November 3, 2023, is granted. #1 Complaint. State of New York Workers Compensation Board answer due 11/3/2023. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/28/2023) (vfr)
|
| Filing 5 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Respond addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Marjorie S. Leff dated 09/27/2023. Document filed by State of New York Workers Compensation Board..(Lee, Young) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Young Woo Lee on behalf of State of New York Workers Compensation Board..(Lee, Young) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. State of New York Workers Compensation Board served on 9/18/2023, answer due 10/10/2023. Service was accepted by Karen Mattison, Administrative Specialist. Document filed by Linda Remy. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does 1-100, State of New York, Workers' Compensation Board. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 455)Document filed by Linda Remy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt).(rdz) |
| Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
| Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to John Does 1-100, State of New York, Workers' Compensation Board..(rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
