Ojeda v. Schrager et al
| Jocelyn Ojeda |
| Ian Schrager, IS Chrystie Management LLC d/b/a Public Hotel, IS Development, LLC and IS Chrystie Management LLC doing business as Public Hotel |
| 1:2023cv08237 |
| September 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sx Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for plaintiff Jocelyn Ojeda ("Plaintiff") and the attorneys for defendants Ian Schrager, IS Chrystie Management LLC d/b/a Public Hotel, and IS Development, LLC (collectively, "Defendants"), that the time for Defendants to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is extended to and including December 4, 2023. The purpose of this request is to provide sufficient time for Defendants and counsel to properly investigate the allegations in the complaint and to prepare the response. Plaintiff filed her Complaint on September 18, 2023, and the Defendants' current deadline to respond is November 12, 2023. This is Defendants' second request for an extension of this deadline (the initial deadline was October 13, 2023). Plaintiff consents to the extension. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Plaintiff's response to any motion filed by Defendants will be due on or before January 4, 2024, and Defendants' reply will be due on or before January 18, 2024. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that facsimile or electronic signatures shall be treated as originals. So ordered. IS Chrystie Management LLC answer due 12/4/2023; IS Development, LLC answer due 12/4/2023; Ian Schrager answer due 12/4/2023.( Replies due by 1/18/2024., Responses due by 1/4/2024) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 11/9/2023) (ate)
|
| Filing 11 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by IS Chrystie Management LLC, IS Development, LLC, Ian Schrager..(Fritz, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephen Bruce Meister on behalf of IS Chrystie Management LLC, IS Development, LLC, Ian Schrager..(Meister, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kevin A. Fritz on behalf of IS Chrystie Management LLC, IS Development, LLC, Ian Schrager..(Fritz, Kevin) |
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for plaintiff Jocelyn Ojeda ("Plaintiff") and the attorneys for defendants Ian Schrager, IS Chrystie Management LLC d/b/a Public Hotel, and IS Development, LLC (collectively, "Defendants"), that the time for Defendants to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is extended to and including November 12, 2023. The purpose of this request is to provide sufficient time for Defendants and counsel to properly investigate the allegations in the complaint and to prepare the response. Plaintiff filed her Complaint on September 18, 2023, and the Defendants' current deadline to respond is October 13, 2023. So ordered. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 10/6/2023) (ate)
|
| Filing 7 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by IS Chrystie Management LLC, IS Development, LLC, Ian Schrager..(Fritz, Kevin) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: IS Chrystie Management LLC answer due 11/12/2023; IS Development, LLC answer due 11/12/2023; Ian Schrager answer due 11/12/2023. (ate) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. IS Chrystie Management LLC served on 9/20/2023, answer due 10/11/2023. Service was accepted by Nancy Dougherty, NYS Secretary of State Agent. Document filed by Jocelyn Ojeda..(Heller, Brian) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Ian Schrager served on 9/22/2023, answer due 10/13/2023. Service was accepted by Wolfgang M.. Document filed by Jocelyn Ojeda..(Heller, Brian) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to IS Chrystie Management LLC, IS Development, LLC, Ian Schrager. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ian Schrager, IS Chrystie Management LLC d/b/a Public Hotel, and/or IS Development, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Jocelyn Ojeda..(Heller, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Heller, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against IS Chrystie Management LLC d/b/a Public Hotel, IS Development, LLC, Ian Schrager. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28304089)Document filed by Jocelyn Ojeda..(Heller, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
