Bushansky v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
| Stephen Bushansky |
| Sovos Brands, Inc., Todd R. Lachman, Neha U. Mathur, Valarie L. Sheppard, William R. Johnson, Tamer Abuaita, David W. Roberts, Vijayanthimala Singh and Jefferson M. Case |
| 1:2023cv08321 |
| September 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lorna G Schofield |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) David W. Roberts, Jefferson M. Case, Neha U. Mathur, Sovos Brands, Inc., Tamer Abuaita, Todd R. Lachman, Valarie L. Sheppard, Vijayanthimala Singh, William R. Johnson. Document filed by Stephen Bushansky. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Rogovin, Michael) |
Filing 4
ORDER: WHEREAS, on September 26, 2023, this case was accepted as related to O'Dell v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al., No. 23 Civ. 7784. The conference scheduled herein will take place concurrently with the conference in the related case. Counsel shall contact counsel in the related case and be prepared to discuss how best to coordinate or consolidate the two cases. It is hereby ORDERED that a telephonic conference will be held on October 25, 2023, at 4:10 p.m. The parties hereto shall call (888) 363-4749 and enter the access code 558-3333. The telephonic conference is public, and the time of the conference is approximate, but the parties shall be ready to proceed by that time. All pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. The parties shall ensure they are all dialed into the conference call by the appointed conference time, as further set forth. Initial Conference set for 10/25/2023 at 04:10 PM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/26/2023) (mml)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (tro) |
| Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (tro) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 1:23-cv-07784-LGS. Notice of Assignment to follow. (tro) |
| CASE REFERRED TO Judge Lorna G. Schofield as possibly related to 23cv7784. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Unassigned. .(pc) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 1:23-cv-07784-LGS. Document filed by Stephen Bushansky..(Rogovin, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Rogovin, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David W. Roberts, Jefferson M. Case, Neha U. Mathur, Sovos Brands, Inc., Tamer Abuaita, Todd R. Lachman, Valarie L. Sheppard, Vijayanthimala Singh, William R. Johnson. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28315783)Document filed by Stephen Bushansky..(Rogovin, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
