Allen v. Coranet Corp. et al
| Neil Allen |
| Coranet Corp. doing business as Coranet and Margaret Marcucci |
| 1:2023cv08380 |
| September 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Andrew L Carter |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michele Cattano on behalf of Coranet Corp., Margaret Marcucci..(Cattano, Michele) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brian Jeffrey Shenker on behalf of Coranet Corp., Margaret Marcucci..(Shenker, Brian) |
Filing 10
STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER, MOVE OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT: It hereby is STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff Neil Allen and Defendants Coranet Corp. d/b/a/ Coranet and Margaret Marcucci, through the undersigned, who are authorized to enter into this Stipulation, as follows: a) That any obligation on the part of Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this matter is extended to and including January 8, 2024. No prior requests for an extension have been made; and, b) By entering into this Stipulation, Defendants waive all defenses to this action based on service of process, and reserve all other defenses. SO ORDERED. Coranet Corp. answer due 1/8/2024; Margaret Marcucci answer due 1/8/2024. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 11/14/2023) (ate)
|
| Filing 9 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Coranet Corp., Margaret Marcucci..(Shenker, Brian) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Coranet Corp. served on 9/27/2023, answer due 10/18/2023. Document filed by Neil Allen..(Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Margaret Marcucci. (sj) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Coranet Corp.. (sj) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT TO SUE UNDER THE F.L.S.A.. Document filed by Neil Allen..(Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Margaret Marcucci, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Neil Allen..(Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Coranet Corp., re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Neil Allen..(Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Lee, C.K.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Coranet Corp., Margaret Marcucci. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28323981)Document filed by Neil Allen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I).(Lee, C.K.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
