Pinaud v. Kijakazi
Ronald Pinaud |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
Social Security Administration |
1:2023cv08577 |
September 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
John G Koeltl |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 LETTER addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from Defendant dated October 2, 2023 re: Consent to a Magistrate Judge. Document filed by Kilolo Kijakazi..(Cohn, Kristina) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kristina Danielle Cohn on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi..(Cohn, Kristina) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE BRIEFING OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 22-MISC-329 Standing Order filed November 21, 2022). WHEREAS, cases filed on and after December 1, 2022 under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), seeking judicial review on the record of final decisions by the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying applications for social security benefits, are governed by the simplified procedures set forth in the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions ("Supplemental Rules" or "Supp. R.");... in order to ensure the efficient disposition of cases subject to the Supplemental Rules, it is hereby ORDERED that, prior to seeking an extension of any deadline set forth in Supp. R. 4, 6, 7, or 8, the party seeking such extension shall attempt to meet and confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to agree upon a reasonable and comprehensive schedule for all future filings in the case. If the parties reach agreement, the proposed schedule shall be presented to the Court for approval and, if approved, will govern all remaining proceedings in the case.... (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on November 18, 2022) (vf) |
NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACTION. The Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York are hereby notified of the commencement of this action. Electronic Certified Administrative Record due by 11/28/2023. (vf) |
Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Christopher James Bowes. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Kilolo Kijakazi. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (vf) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John G. Koeltl. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Bowes, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28355683)Document filed by Ronald Pinaud..(Bowes, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.