Mendez v. Exotic Campus Convenience Store Inc. et al
| Natalia Mendez |
| Exotic Campus Convenience Store Inc. and Aum 1470 Williamsbridge LLC |
| 1:2023cv09093 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Andrew L Carter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff, Natalia Mendez by and through her counsel, hereby gives notice that the above captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against Defendants, Exotic Campus Convenience Store Inc. and AUM 1470 Williamsbridge LLC since no party has answered or otherwise moved for summary judgment in this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 12/12/2023) (ate)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Aum 1470 Williamsbridge LLC, Exotic Campus Convenience Store Inc.. Document filed by Natalia Mendez. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Exotic Campus Convenience Store Inc. served on 11/2/2023, answer due 11/24/2023. Service was accepted by NANCY DOUGHERTY, LEGAL CLERK. Document filed by Natalia Mendez..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Aum 1470 Williamsbridge LLC served on 11/2/2023, answer due 11/24/2023. Service was accepted by NANCY DOUGHERTY, LEGAL CLERK. Document filed by Natalia Mendez..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Aum 1470 Williamsbridge LLC, Exotic Campus Convenience Store Inc. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to EXOTIC CAMPUS CONVENIENCE STORE INC. AND AUM 1470 WILLIAMSBRIDGE LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Natalia Mendez..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aum 1470 Williamsbridge LLC, Exotic Campus Convenience Store Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28430847)Document filed by Natalia Mendez..(Marks, Bradly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
