Disame v. Kantharia
| Andrew M. Disame |
| Bharat K. Kantharia |
| 1:2023cv09735 |
| November 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 mm Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 5. Mailed to: Andrew M. Disame 519 Ralph Ave #1 Brooklyn, NY 11233. (sha) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff has now had multiple opportunities to amend his complaint to properly invoke this Court's jurisdiction, and has failed to do so. Accordingly, his complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/12/2023) (vfr)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from A. Disame, dated 12/1/23 re: ORDER -CORRESPONDENCE DATE - In the lawsuit, I have simply made a request for a payment against the restrictions our society has put in place for stealing something etc. Document filed by Andrew M. Disame.(sc) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: Andrew M. Disame 519 Ralph Ave #1 Brooklyn, NY 11233. (sha) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Accordingly, the Complaint has failed to contain "a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction," Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1). Therefore, by December 8, 2023, Plaintiff shall amend his pleading to allege the citizenship of all of the parties and offer sufficient factual support for the amount in controversy. If Plaintiff fails to amend by the foregoing date to allege complete diversity and offer sufficient factual support for the amount in controversy, the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. (Amended Pleadings due by 12/8/2023.) (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 11/8/2023) (jca)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bharat K. Kantharia. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number 22877) Document filed by Andrew M. Disame. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Bharat K. Kantharia. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Disame v. Kantharia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew M. Disame | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bharat K. Kantharia | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
