Beqiraj v. Mayorkas et al
Arber Beqiraj |
Secretary, DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, USCIS Ur M. Jaddou, Director Sue Raufer, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Sue Raufer |
1:2023cv09937 |
November 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Vernon S Broderick |
Other Immigration Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. APPLICATION GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Extension is granted until March 12, 2024. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 1/4/2024) (rro) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Ur M. Jaddou answer due 3/12/2024; Alejandro Mayorkas answer due 3/12/2024; Sue Raufer answer due 3/12/2024. (rro) |
Filing 10 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the complaint addressed to Judge Vernon S. Broderick from Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher dated 1-3-24. Document filed by Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Sue Raufer..(Ramirez-Fisher, Leslie) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher on behalf of Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Sue Raufer..(Ramirez-Fisher, Leslie) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Sue Raufer. (sj) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Ur M. Jaddou. (sj) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alejandro Mayorkas. (sj) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Thomas Vincent Massucci. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 05:0552; County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 05:0706; the County code has been modified to Bronx. (sj) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Sue Raufer, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Arber Beqiraj..(Massucci, Thomas) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Ur M. Jaddou, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Arber Beqiraj..(Massucci, Thomas) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Alejandro Mayorkas, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Arber Beqiraj..(Massucci, Thomas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Massucci, Thomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Sue Raufer (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28551768).Document filed by Arber Beqiraj..(Massucci, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.