Venning v. Primark US Corp.
Plaintiff: Travis Venning
Defendant: Primark US Corp.
Case Number: 1:2023cv10176
Filed: November 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Jesse M Furman
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Primark US Corp. waiver sent on 12/15/2023, answer due 2/13/2024. Document filed by Travis Venning..(Borrelli, Michael)
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Casey Katz Pearlman on behalf of Primark US Corp...(Pearlman, Casey)
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Bradley J. Bartolomeo on behalf of Primark US Corp...(Bartolomeo, Bradley)
December 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference Order served on Bradley Bartolomeo, Esq. on 12/7/2023. Document filed by Travis Venning..(Borrelli, Michael)
December 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against Primark US Corp. with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Travis Venning. Related document: #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B).(Borrelli, Michael)
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, counsel for all parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on February 21, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. The conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (888) 363-4749 and using access code 542-1540, followed by the pound (#) key. All counsel must also familiarize themselves with the Court's Individual Rules, which are available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. Absent leave of Court obtained by letter-motion filed before the conference, all pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. The joint letter shall not exceed five (5) pages, and shall provide the following information in separate paragraphs: as set forth herein. Counsel who have entered a notice of appearance as of the issuance of this order aredirected (1) to notify counsel for all other parties in this action who have not yet appeared by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices forthwith, and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices to that party personally. SO ORDERED.Telephonic Initial Conference set for 2/21/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 12/06/2023) (ama)
December 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #8 Letter Plaintiff's Response to Judge Furman's November 27, 2023 Order to Show Cause [Dkt. No. 5], filed by Travis Venning. ENDORSEMENT:In light of this letter and the amendments to the complaint, the Court is persuaded that it would be inappropriate to dismiss the case sua sponte at this juncture. In the event that the Defendant, upon appearing, raises any of these issues the Court will have an opportunity to consider them with the benefit of adversarial briefing. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 12/5/23) (yv)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 LETTER addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Tenzin S. Tashi dated December 4, 2023 re: Plaintiff's Response to Judge Furman's November 27, 2023 Order to Show Cause [Dkt. No. 5]. Document filed by Travis Venning. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit First Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's paystub, #3 Exhibit Primark - About Us, #4 Exhibit Primark NY Store Locations).(Tashi, Tenzin)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tenzin Shenpen Tashi on behalf of Travis Venning..(Tashi, Tenzin)
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Primark US Corp. waiver sent on 11/29/2023, answer due 1/29/2024. Document filed by Travis Venning..(Borrelli, Michael)
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER:In light of the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing by December 4, 2023, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Defendant may file a response no later than December 11, 2023. If Plaintiff fails to show cause or does not file anything by the deadline, the Court will dismiss the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction without further notice to the parties. Finally, Plaintiff is directed to serve on Defendant a copy of this Order, and to file proof of such service on the docket, within two business days of this Order. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 11/27/2023) (rro)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Primark US Corp...(jgo)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo)
November 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Case Designated ECF. (jgo)
November 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Primark US Corp., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Travis Venning..(Borrelli, Michael)
November 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Borrelli, Michael)
November 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Primark US Corp.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28591883)Document filed by Travis Venning. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A).(Borrelli, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Venning v. Primark US Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travis Venning
Represented By: Michael John Borrelli
Represented By: Tenzin Shenpen Tashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Primark US Corp.
Represented By: Bradley J. Bartolomeo
Represented By: Casey Katz Pearlman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?