Hilton v. City of New York- Department of Finance et al
| Rosette Hilton |
| City of New York - New York City Department of Finance, Shenneth King and Leonard Nguyen |
| 1:2023cv10358 |
| November 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rodalton J Poole on behalf of Shenneth King, Leonard Nguyen..(Poole, Rodalton) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. City of New York - New York City Department of Finance served on 11/30/2023, answer due 2/15/2024; Shenneth King served on 11/30/2023, answer due 2/15/2024; Leonard Nguyen served on 11/30/2023, answer due 2/15/2024. Service was accepted by Office of the Corporation Counsel. Document filed by Rosette Hilton..(Schwartz, Arthur) |
Filing 11
ORDER: granting #9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. The request is granted. Defendants shall respond to the complaint by February 15, 2024. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 12/20/2023) (ama)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rodalton J Poole on behalf of City of New York - New York City Department of Finance..(Poole, Rodalton) |
| Filing 9 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Rodalton Poole dated 12/20/2023. Document filed by City of New York - New York City Department of Finance..(Poole, Rodalton) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: City of New York - New York City Department of Finance answer due 2/15/2024; Shenneth King answer due 2/15/2024; Leonard Nguyen answer due 2/15/2024. (ama) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Shenneth King..(jgo) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Leonard Nguyen..(jgo) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of New York - New York City Department of Finance..(jgo) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Leonard Nguyen, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rosette Hilton..(Schwartz, Arthur) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Shenneth King, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rosette Hilton..(Schwartz, Arthur) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to City of New York - New York City Department of Finance, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Rosette Hilton..(Schwartz, Arthur) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Schwartz, Arthur) Modified on 11/28/2023 (jgo). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of New York- Department of Finance, Shenneth King, Nguyen Leonard. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28616592)Document filed by Rosette Hilton..(Schwartz, Arthur) |
| Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Arthur Z Schwartz to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the civil cover sheet is not correct; the PDF does not contain a proper signature of the attorney;. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated October 1, 2020. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated October 1, 2020 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet.. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Arthur Z Schwartz. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 42:2000; Nature of Suit code 445 (Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment); Dollar Demand $2,500,000,000; Arbitration code e (Exempt); County code New York;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 29:621; the Nature of Suit code has been modified to 442 (Civil Rights: Jobs); the Dollar Demand has been modified to $2,500,000; the Arbitration code has been deleted; the County code has been modified to Nassau;. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Arthur Z Schwartz. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: City of New York- Department of Finance; Nguyen Leonard. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error;. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
