Ling v. City of New York et al
Sue Ling |
The City Of New York,, John Doe, Jane Doe, City of New York and John Doe and Jane Doe #1-7 |
1:2023cv10406 |
November 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Analisa Torres |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. GRANTED. The deadline to submit a joint letter and proposed case management plan is ADJOURNED from January 29, 2024, to June 12, 2024. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 1/26/2024) (jca) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Case Mgmt. Plan & Comply with ECF 5 Pending Completion of Limited Discovery & Mediation Required by Local Rule 83.10(h). Document filed by City of New York..(Difronzo, Luca) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Luca Difronzo on behalf of City of New York..(Difronzo, Luca) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. City of New York served on 12/21/2023, answer due 1/11/2024. Service was accepted by Jerry Bradshaw. Document filed by Sue Ling..(Akakwam, Philip) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to City of New York. (vf) |
Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Akakwam, Philip) |
Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The City of New York, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sue Ling..(Akakwam, Philip) |
Filing 5 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by January 29, 2024, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/5/2023) (jca) |
Filing 4 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by January 29, 2024, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND THE COURT'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES TO ALL PARTIES. If this case has been settled or otherwise terminated, counsel are required to file a stipulation of discontinuance, voluntary dismissal, or other proof of termination electronically on ECF, with a courtesy copy emailed to chambers in accordance with the Courts Individual Practices. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/5/2023) (jca) |
Filing 3 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 12/5/2023) (jca) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Philip Anaekperechi Akakwam to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; the filing must only include the summons request;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Philip Anaekperechi Akakwam. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: The City Of New York; John Doe. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING REMOVAL OF PARTY. Notice to attorney Philip Anaekperechi Akakwam. The following party/parties has been removed from this case: Jane Doe. The party was added to the case in error. (jgo) |
NOTICE OF PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL CIVIL RULE 83.10 (FORMERLY THE SECTION 1983 PLAN) : Unless otherwise ordered, this case shall participate in the Southern District of New York's Local Civil Rule 83.10. Please reference the Court's website, https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/programs/mediation-adr, to review Local Civil Rule 83.10, updated 4/1/2015, for important information.(rpr) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Philip Anaekperechi Akakwam. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet separately. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (jgo) Modified on 11/30/2023 (jgo). |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Philip Anaekperechi Akakwam. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Nature of Suit code 550 (Prisoner: Civil Rights);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Nature of Suit code has been modified to 440 (Civil Rights: Other);. (jgo) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Filing 2 FILING ERROR - SUMMONS REQUEST FILING ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The City of New York, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sue Ling. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet).(Akakwam, Philip) Modified on 11/30/2023 (jgo). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane Doe, John Doe, The City Of New York,. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28625408)Document filed by Sue Ling..(Akakwam, Philip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.