Indus Apparel, USA, Inc. v. Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd
| Indus Apparel, USA, Inc. |
| Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd. and Does 1-20, inclusive |
| 1:2023cv10426 |
| November 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on February 16, 2024, at 4:30 p.m. The conference will be held telephonically. At the scheduled date and time, the parties are to call (888) 363-4749 and enter access code 5123533. Initial Conference set for 2/16/2024 at 04:30 PM before Judge Katherine Polk Failla. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 1/12/2024) (rro)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: granting #10 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #10 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint. addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Bradley S. Pensyl dated December 28, 2023. Application GRANTED. Defendant shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before February 1, 2024. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket number 10. SO ORDERED. Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd. answer due 2/1/2024. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/29/2023) (ama)
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint addressed to Judge Katherine Polk Failla from Bradley S. Pensyl dated December 28, 2023. Document filed by Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd...(Pensyl, Bradley) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kendall Robert Pauley on behalf of Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd...(Pauley, Kendall) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Bradley Stephen Pensyl on behalf of Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd...(Pensyl, Bradley) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd. served on 12/12/2023, answer due 1/2/2024. Service was accepted by Andrea "Doe", Employee. Document filed by Indus Apparel, USA, Inc...(Kaba, Moez) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd.. (vf) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Indus Apparel, USA, Inc...(Kaba, Moez) |
| ADD PARTY FOR PLEADING. Defendants/Respondents Does 1-20, inclusive added. Party added pursuant to #1 Complaint.Document filed by Indus Apparel, USA, Inc.. Related document: #1 Complaint..(Kaba, Moez) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Moez M. Kaba to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; Defendant party name listed on Summons PDF does not correspond to pleading caption. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Moez M. Kaba re: Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): all of the parties listed on the pleading were not entered on CM ECF. Add party Does 1-20, inclusive. Docket the event type Add Party to Pleading found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Indus Apparel, USA, Inc.(Kaba, Moez) Modified on 11/30/2023 (vf). |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Other Affiliate Indus Apparel (PVT) Ltd. for Indus Apparel, USA, Inc.. Document filed by Indus Apparel, USA, Inc...(Kaba, Moez) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Kaba, Moez) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bangladesh Export Import Company Ltd.. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28626637)Document filed by Indus Apparel, USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B).(Kaba, Moez) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
