Hopkins v. United States of America
| Arius Hopkins |
| United States of America |
| 1:2023cv10667 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lewis A Kaplan |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 LETTER from A. Hopkins, dated 12/22/23 re: I am writing to get clarification concerning whether or not you have a filed copy of the 28:2255 & Memorandum of Law I filed; yet not be confused with a separate 28:2255 which you have received with no signature etc. Please confirm that you have received/filed the correctly signed 28:2255 & Memorandum of Law that I mailed to you on 12/3/23. Document filed by Arius Hopkins.(sc) |
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE: Movant is therefore directed to resubmit the signature page of the motion with an original signature to the court within thirty days of the date of this order. A copy of the signature page is attached to this order. No answer shall be required at this time. If Movant complies with this order, the case shall proceed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Movant fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Lewis A. Kaplan on 12/11/2023) (ks)
|
| NOTICE OF MAILING: A copy of the 12/11/2023 order was mailed by First Class mail to ARIUS HOPKINS (Reg. No. 79689-054), USP Lee, U.S. PENITENTIARY, P.O. BOX 305JONESVILLE, VA 24263, (Mohan, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (28 U.S.C. 2255). NO FURTHER ENTRIES. PLEASE SEE CRIMINAL CASE: 1:17-cr-00791-LAK-4. Document filed by Arius Hopkins. (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hopkins v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Arius Hopkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
