Martin v. Shanley
| SHAUN MARTIN |
| RAYMOND SHANLEY |
| 1:2023cv11149 |
| December 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Katharine H Parker |
| Mary Kay Vyskocil |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Request GRANTED. Respondents answer is due by Friday, May 3, 2024. Any reply by petitioner is due by Monday June 3, 2024. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 1/30/2024) (vfr)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Raymond Shanley answer due 5/3/2024. (vfr) |
| Filing 8 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time addressed to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker. Document filed by Raymond Shanley..(Kress, Stephen) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephen Joseph Kress on behalf of Raymond Shanley..(Kress, Stephen) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO ANSWER 28 U.S.C. 2254: Having determined that this petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 should not be summarily dismissed, the Court hereby orders that: The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and the petition on the Attorney General of the State of New York and on the District Attorney of New York County by electronic means through the use of the court's CM/ECF system. Within sixty days (60) of the date of this order, Respondent must file and serve (1) an answer, motion, or other response to the petition, and (2) the transcripts and briefs identified in Rule 5(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioner may file and serve any reply papers within thirty days from the date Petitioner is served with Respondent's answer. SO ORDERED. Raymond Shanley answer due on 3/4/2024. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker on 1/2/2024) (vfr)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Habeas Corpus. Referred to Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker. (Signed by Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil on 1/2/2024) (tg)
|
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Richard E. Mischel. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Albany;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Greene;. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Richard E. Mischel. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: SHAUN MARTIN, RAYMOND SHANLEY. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps; party role was entered incorrectly; DO NOT TYPE ALL PARTY NAMES IN ALL CAPS. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Filing 4 FIRST MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Declaration in Support, #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus . Document filed by SHAUN MARTIN..(Mischel, Richard) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Richard Mischel in Support re: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Document filed by SHAUN MARTIN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Decision & Order, #3 Exhibit Transcript of hearing, #4 Exhibit Decision & Order).(Mischel, Richard) |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. County of Conviction: New York. (Filing Fee $ 5.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28733769)Document filed by SHAUN MARTIN..(Mischel, Richard) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Mischel, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Shanley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SHAUN MARTIN | |
| Represented By: | Richard E. Mischel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RAYMOND SHANLEY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
