Lewis v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
| Syvilla Lewis |
| Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States and Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2024cv00268 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| James L Cott |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Syvilla Lewis. (Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge) CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 1/22/2024).(rro) |
| Filing 7 PROPOSED CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Syvilla Lewis. Document filed by Syvilla Lewis..(Konoski, Bryan) |
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER IN RE BRIEFING OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 22-MISC-329 Standing Order filed November 21, 2022). WHEREAS, cases filed on and after December 1, 2022 under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), seeking judicial review on the record of final decisions by the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying applications for social security benefits, are governed by the simplified procedures set forth in the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions ("Supplemental Rules" or "Supp. R.");... in order to ensure the efficient disposition of cases subject to the Supplemental Rules, it is hereby ORDERED that, prior to seeking an extension of any deadline set forth in Supp. R. 4, 6, 7, or 8, the party seeking such extension shall attempt to meet and confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to agree upon a reasonable and comprehensive schedule for all future filings in the case. If the parties reach agreement, the proposed schedule shall be presented to the Court for approval and, if approved, will govern all remaining proceedings in the case.... (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/18/2022) (pc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Fergus John Kaiser on behalf of Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States..(Kaiser, Fergus) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Bryan Matthew Konoski. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error;. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Bryan Matthew Konoski. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 42:416;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 42:405;. (pc) |
| NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACTION. The Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York are hereby notified of the commencement of this action. Electronic Certified Administrative Record due by 3/18/2024..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Magistrate Judge James L. Cott is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Vernon S. Broderick. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States. Document filed by Syvilla Lewis..(Konoski, Bryan) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Bryan Matthew Konoski to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct;. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 1/22/2024. (pc) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Syvilla Lewis..(Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Konoski, Bryan) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - PDF ERROR - COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28804641)Document filed by Syvilla Lewis..(Konoski, Bryan) Modified on 1/16/2024 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
