Lucas v. O'Malley
| Matthew Lucas |
| Martin J. O'Malley |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2024cv00275 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Robyn F Tarnofsky |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY A US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Matthew Lucas, Martin J. O'Malley. (Case No Longer Referred to Magistrate Judge) CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 1/19/2024).(rro) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED CONSENT TO JURISDICTION BY US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Martin J. O'Malley. Document filed by Martin J. O'Malley..(Ghatage, Padma) |
| NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACTION. The Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York are hereby notified of the commencement of this action. Electronic Certified Administrative Record due by 3/19/2024..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky is so redesignated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. (vba) |
| NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF A REFERRAL TO ANOTHER MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The referral in the above entitled action has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky, for Social Security. Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave no longer referred to the case. (vba) |
Filing 8
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before Magistrate Judge Cave. If both parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant must, within two weeks of the date of this Order, either mail or email to Failla_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this Order (and also available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/consent-proceed-us-magistrate-judge). If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before Magistrate Judge Cave rather than before the undersigned and as further set forth in this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 1/18/24) (yv)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 1/18/24) (yv)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING IFP APPLICATION: Leave to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees is authorized. 28 U.S.C. 1915. Leave to proceed in this matter without prepayment of fees is authorized. See 28 U.S.C. 1915. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion at docket entry 2. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 1/18/24) (yv)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Padma Ghatage on behalf of Martin J. O'Malley..(Ghatage, Padma) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER IN RE BRIEFING OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 22-MISC-329 Standing Order filed November 21, 2022). WHEREAS, cases filed on and after December 1, 2022 under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), seeking judicial review on the record of final decisions by the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying applications for social security benefits, are governed by the simplified procedures set forth in the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions ("Supplemental Rules" or "Supp. R.");... in order to ensure the efficient disposition of cases subject to the Supplemental Rules, it is hereby ORDERED that, prior to seeking an extension of any deadline set forth in Supp. R. 4, 6, 7, or 8, the party seeking such extension shall attempt to meet and confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to agree upon a reasonable and comprehensive schedule for all future filings in the case. If the parties reach agreement, the proposed schedule shall be presented to the Court for approval and, if approved, will govern all remaining proceedings in the case.... (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/18/2022) (jgo)
|
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Insler, Lewis) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis . Document filed by Matthew Lucas..(Insler, Lewis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin J. O'Malley. Document filed by Matthew Lucas..(Insler, Lewis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
