Cordero v. The City of New York et al
| Davy Cordero and Elias Zabala |
| The City of New York, Benjamin Warren, Michael McDermott and John and Jane Does 1-2 |
| 1:2024cv00293 |
| January 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| J Paul Oetken |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #4 Complaint against John and Jane Does 1-2, Michael McDermott, The City of New York, Benjamin Warren with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Davy Cordero, Elias Zabala. Related document: #4 Complaint..(Pawar, Vik) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Niki Renee Slattery on behalf of The City of New York..(Slattery, Niki) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. The City of New York served on 1/23/2024, answer due 2/13/2024. Service was accepted by Jerry Bradshaw. Document filed by Davy Cordero..(Pawar, Vik) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Michael McDermott, The City of New York, Benjamin Warren. (vf) |
| NOTICE OF PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL CIVIL RULE 83.10 (FORMERLY THE SECTION 1983 PLAN) : Unless otherwise ordered, this case shall participate in the Southern District of New York's Local Civil Rule 83.10. Please reference the Court's website, https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/programs/mediation-adr, to review Local Civil Rule 83.10, updated 4/1/2015, for important information.(rpr) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The City of New York, Michael McDermott, Benjamin Warren, re: #4 Complaint. Document filed by Davy Cordero..(Pawar, Vik) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against John and Jane Does 1-2, Michael McDermott, The City of New York, Benjamin Warren. Document filed by Davy Cordero..(Pawar, Vik) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Vik Pawar to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; The Request for Issuance of Summons cannot be issued for the party requested (John and Jane Does 1-2) because it does not identify the party subject to service. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(A) and FRCP Rule 4(a)(1)(B): a summons must name the parties and be directed to the defendant. Once the party has been identified, the filing party may request a summons at that time.;. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Vik Pawar. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Davey Cordero. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party name was entered in all caps. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Vik Pawar to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Signature Error. The pleading was not signed by the ECF Filing Attorney user. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Vik Pawar. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand Blank. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to 1,000,000. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge J. Paul Oetken. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Pawar, Vik) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to The City of New York, Benjamin Warren and Michael McDermott, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Davey Cordero..(Pawar, Vik) Modified on 1/16/2024 (vf). |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - SIGNATURE ERROR - COMPLAINT against John and Jane Does 1-2, Michael McDermott, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Benjamin Warren. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28810403)Document filed by Davey Cordero..(Pawar, Vik) Modified on 1/16/2024 (vf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
