Mullins v. Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC
| Derrick Mullins |
| Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC and DANHAR ENTERPRISES INC. |
| 1:2024cv00437 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 ANSWER to #4 Complaint. Document filed by Danhar Enterprises Inc...(Porcaro, Matthew) |
| Filing 19 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Danhar Enterprises Inc...(Porcaro, Matthew) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint. Document filed by Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC..(Josephs, Bonnie) |
| Filing 17 LETTER addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Bonnie P. Josephs dated March 4, 2024 re: Request For Extension Of Time To File Answer. Document filed by Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC..(Josephs, Bonnie) |
Filing 16
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #15 Letter filed by Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC. ENDORSEMENT: Counsel are reminded that applications for relief must be filed as letter-motions, not as ordinary letters. Nonetheless, application GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/5/2024) (tg)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC answer due 3/8/2024. (tg) |
| Filing 15 LETTER addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Bonnie P. Josephs dated March 4, 2024 re: Mullins v. Flaming Saddles NYC#1,LLC,et al. Document filed by Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC..(Josephs, Bonnie) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #13 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Matthew J. Porcaro, Esq. dated February 29, 2024., #4 Complaint. Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 13. SO ORDERED. (Danhar Enterprises Inc. answer due 3/8/2024.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 2/29/24) (yv)
|
| Filing 13 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Matthew J. Porcaro, Esq. dated February 29, 2024. Document filed by Danhar Enterprises Inc...(Porcaro, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of true copies of Judge Jesse M. Furman's February 29, 2024 Order [Dkt. 11] served on Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC and Danhar Enterprises Inc. on February 29, 2024. Service was made by EMAIL. Document filed by Derrick Mullins..(Marks, Bradly) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER. Defendants in this action appear to be in default. Plaintiff shall file any motion for default judgment, in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases (available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman), within two weeks of the date of this Order. If Plaintiff's counsel submits calculations in support of any motion for default judgment, Plaintiff's counsel shall also email native versions of the files with the calculations (i.e., versions of the files in their original format, such as in ".xlsx") to Chambers at Furman_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order electronically and/or by first-class mail on Defendants within two business days from the date of this Order and shall file proof of such service within three business days of the date of this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 2/29/24) (yv)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matthew John Porcaro on behalf of Danhar Enterprises Inc...(Porcaro, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC served on 2/7/2024, answer due 2/28/2024. Service was accepted by NANCY DOUGHERTY, LEGAL CLERK. Document filed by Derrick Mullins..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Danhar Enterprises Inc. served on 2/7/2024, answer due 2/28/2024. Service was accepted by NANCY DOUGHERTY, LEGAL CLERK. Document filed by Derrick Mullins..(Marks, Bradly) |
|
Filing 7
MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that this case is referred for mediation to the Court-annexed Mediation Program. The parties are hereby notified that Local Rule 83.9 shall govern the mediation and are directed to participate in the mediation in good faith. The mediation should take place at least two weeks prior to the Initial Pretrial Conference, which is currently scheduled (by separate Order to be entered today) for April 18, 2024. The mediation will have no effect upon any scheduling Order issued by this Court without leave of this Court. Mediators will be assigned based on the nature of suit. Additional expertise requests should promptly be directed to the Mediation Office. SO ORDERED. Please reference the following when corresponding with the Mediation Office. E-mail MediationOffice@nysd.uscourts.gov, telephone (212) 805-0643, and facsimile (212) 805-0647. (Mediator to be Assigned by 2/6/2024.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/23/24) (yv)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING EARLY MEDIATION AND THE INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Separate and apart from the foregoing, unless and until the Court orders otherwise, counsel for all parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on April 18, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. The conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Courts dedicated conference line at (888) 363-4749 and using access code 542-1540, followed by the pound (#) key. Additionally, in accordance with Paragraph 3.D of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file on ECF a joint letter, described below, as well as a proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order attached as an exhibit to the joint letter, no later than Thursday of the week prior to the initial pretrial conference. The parties shall use this Court's form Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, which is also available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-m-furman. Any open legal issues can be addressed at the conference. The joint letter shall not exceed five (5) pages, and shall provide the following information in separate paragraphs as further set forth in this Order. Counsel who have entered a notice of appearance as of the issuance of this order are directed (1) to notify counsel for all other parties in this action who have not yet appeared by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices forthwith, and (2) to file proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules and Practices to that party personally. SO ORDERED. ( Initial Conference set for 4/18/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/23/24) (yv)
|
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Danhar Enterprises Inc., Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC..(pc) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Danhar Enterprises Inc., Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC. Document filed by Derrick Mullins..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Bradly G. Marks to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong filer/filers were selected for the pleading;. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Bradly G. Marks. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: DANHAR ENTERPRISES INC.. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name was entered in all caps;. (pc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to FLAMING SADDLES NYC #1, LLC AND DANHAR ENTERPRISES INC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Derrick Mullins..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Marks, Bradly) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILER ERROR - COMPLAINT against Flaming Saddles NYC #1, LLC, DANHAR ENTERPRISES INC.. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28836294)Document filed by Derrick Mullins, DANHAR ENTERPRISES INC...(Marks, Bradly) Modified on 1/22/2024 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
