Wrubel v. Eli Lilly & Company
| Marissa Wrubel |
| Eli Lilly & Company |
| 1:2024cv00726 |
| February 1, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John P Cronan |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - Eastern District of Pennsylvania acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 2:24-cv-00841, filed on 2/27/2024.(rju) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER OUT ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL...transferring this action from the U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y to the United States District Court - Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/23/2024) (vba) |
| MDL TRANSFER OUT ELECTRONICALLY: to the United States District Court - Eastern District of Pennsylvania.(vba) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Eli Lilly & Company waiver sent on 2/2/2024, answer due 4/2/2024. Document filed by Marissa Wrubel..(Haberman, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Eli Lilly & Company. (vf) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Marissa Wrubel..(Haberman, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Haberman, Jeffrey) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Jeffrey Louis Haberman to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Request for Issuance of Summons,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; party name on the docket entry text and the PDF 'To' section does not match as it appears on the pleading caption. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Jeffrey Louis Haberman. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet separately. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Jeffrey Louis Haberman. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Office code White Plains; County code Albany; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Office code has been modified to Foley Square; the County code has been modified to New York; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Jeffrey Louis Haberman. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Marissa Wrubel; Eli Lilly & Company. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly;. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John P. Cronan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Eli Lilly and Company Corporate Office, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Marissa Wrubel..(Haberman, Jeffrey) Modified on 2/2/2024 (jgo). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eli Lilly & Company. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28891404)Document filed by Marissa Wrubel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet 1).(Haberman, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wrubel v. Eli Lilly & Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marissa Wrubel | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Louis Haberman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eli Lilly & Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
