615 Building Company LLC. v. Smith et al
Petitioner: 615 Building Company LLC.
Respondent: Louisa A Smith, John Doe, Doe Jane and Jane and John Does
Case Number: 1:2024cv00753
Filed: February 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2024 CASE REMANDED OUT from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the State Court - Civil Court of the State of New York, County of New York. Sent certified copy of docket entries and remand order. Mailed via UPS Tracking Number 1ZE22E530210050386 on 3/13/2024..(ks)
March 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Accordingly, this case is REMANDED to New York Civil Court, County of New York. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Smith and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/12/2024) (ks) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
February 13, 2024 Filing 4 DECLARATION of Louisa A. Smith re: #2 Order,, Declaration in Response to Order. Document filed by Louisa A Smith..(Smith, Louisa)
February 12, 2024 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Smith, Louisa)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The Court notes that Defendant is a barred attorney, and, accordingly, will not grant her the "special solicitude" usually afforded to pro se litigants. See Tracy v. Freshwater, 623 F.3d 90, 103 (2d Cir. 2010). Defendant is directed to show cause, by filing a declaration by February 13, 2024, why this action should not be remanded to state court. Defendant's declaration must allege facts addressing each issue identified in this order. If Defendant fails to comply with this order within the prescribed time, the Court will remand this action under 28 U.S.C. 1447(c) to the Supreme Court, New York County. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 2/6/2024) (ks)
February 5, 2024 Case Designated ECF. (vf)
February 5, 2024 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO ELECTRONICALLY FILE CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to Attorney Louisa Arnold Smith. Attorney must electronically file the Civil Cover Sheet. Use the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents. (vf)
February 5, 2024 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Louisa Arnold Smith. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: John Doe, Doe Jane. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party name entered incorrectly. (vf)
February 5, 2024 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf)
February 5, 2024 Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf)
February 2, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York Civil Court, County of New York. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28898411).Document filed by Louisa A Smith..(Smith, Louisa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 615 Building Company LLC. v. Smith et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: 615 Building Company LLC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Louisa A Smith
Represented By: Louisa Arnold Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Doe Jane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jane and John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?