Smith v. Empire City Labs et al
Jaha C. Smith |
Empire City Labs, South Manhattan 369, Ms. Harris, John Doe I, John Doe II and Dr. Donald Wallerson |
1:2024cv00855 |
February 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Jennifer L Rochon |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MOTION re for Permission for Jaha C. Smith to participate in electronic case filing in this case. Document filed by Jaha C. Smith. (sac) |
Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: Jaha C. Smith consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by Jaha C. Smith. (sac) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe I, John Doe II, Empire City Labs, Harris, South Manhattan 369, Donald Wallerson. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number 26069) Document filed by Jaha C. Smith. (sac) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Empire City Labs, Harris, South Manhattan 369, Donald Wallerson. (sac) |
Magistrate Judge Gary Stein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.