Kraemer v Schroeder et al
| Elena Kraemer |
| Douglas Schroeder, Jian Wang, Gary Martens and Anamaria Bonilla |
| 1:2024cv01015 |
| February 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Lorna G Schofield |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: All parties do not consent to conducting all further proceedings before a United States Magistrate Judge, including motions and trial. All fact discovery shall be completed no later than August 8, 2024. If you have identified types of experts in question 9(a), all expert discovery shall be completed no later than September 24, 2024. If you have identified types of experts in question 9(a), by July 9, 2024 the parties shall meet and confer on a schedule for expert disclosures, including reports, production of underlying documents and depositions, provided that (i) expert report(s) of the party with the burden of proof shall be due before those of the opposing party's expert(s); and (ii) all expert discovery shall be completed by the date set forth in paragraph 9(b). This case is to be tried to a jury. Counsel for the parties have conferred and their present best estimate of the length of trial is 5 days. By June 11, 2024, the parties shall submit a joint status letter, as outlined in Individual Rule III.D.3. By August 22, 2024, the parties shall submit a joint status letter, as outlined in Individual Rule III.D.3 and, in the event that they have not already been referred for settlement discussions, shall also advise the Court whether or not they request a referral for settlement discussions as provided in Paragraph 4( c) above. On October 9, 2024, at 4:10 P.M., a pre-motion conference will be held for any anticipated dispositive motions. To join the conference, the parties shall call (888) 363-4749 and use Access Code 558-3333. The time of the conference is approximate, but the parties shall be ready to proceed at that time. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the dates under paragraphs 5, 6, 8(a), 9(b)-(c) and 13(a)-(c) into the Court's calendar, and to schedule the conference under paragraph 13(c) as a Pre-Motion Conference, even though the conference will be held by telephone. Amended Pleadings due by 6/20/2024. Joinder of Parties due by 6/20/2024. Deposition due by 7/9/2024. Fact Discovery due by 8/8/2024. Expert Discovery due by 9/24/2024. Telephone Conference set for 10/9/2024 at 04:10 PM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/8/2024) (ate)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that the April 10, 2024, initial pretrial conference is CANCELLED. If the parties believe that a conference would nevertheless be useful, they should inform the court immediately so the conference can be reinstated. The case management plan and scheduling order will issue separately. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/8/2024) (ate)
|
|
Filing 25
STIPULATION FOR THE PRODUCTION AND EXCHANGE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their undersigned counsel (the "Stipulation"), that: Counsel for any party producing documents or information in this matter may designate any document or information, in whole or in part, as confidential if counsel determines, in good faith, that such designation is necessary to protect the confidentiality interests of an individual or entity ("Confidential Information"). Such designation may be made by marking each page of a document containing Confidential Information with the legend "confidential", or by classifying testimony containing Confidential Information as "confidential" on the record at the deposition or hearing, or by written notice to all other parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, "Confidential Information" shall not include information that plaintiff would be entitled to receive through a request under the New York State Freedom of Information Law, federal Freedom of Information Act, or a similar law. Defendants will use their best efforts to avoid designating such information as "Confidential Information." Documents may be filed under seal only as provided in the Court's Individual Rules I.D.3. The parties acknowledge that the Court retains discretion as to whether, in Orders and Opinions, to afford confidential treatment to information that the parties have redacted, sealed or designated as confidential. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 4/8/2024) (ate)
|
| Filing 24 PROPOSED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Document filed by Anamaria Bonilla, Gary Martens, Douglas Schroeder, Jian Wang..(Mustes, Jennifer) |
| Filing 23 LETTER addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Michael Sussman dated 04/03/2024 re: Pre-conference letter with Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order attached. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 22 PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
|
Filing 21
STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the undersigned counsel that Defendants' Douglas Schroeder, Jian Wang, Gary Martens, and Anamaria Bonilla time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (ECF No. 8) is extended up to and including April 30, 2024. This is the first extension of Defendants' response deadline. SO ORDERED. Anamaria Bonilla answer due 4/30/2024; Gary Martens answer due 4/30/2024; Douglas Schroeder answer due 4/30/2024; Jian Wang answer due 4/30/2024. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 3/25/2024) (mml)
|
| Filing 20 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Anamaria Bonilla, Gary Martens, Douglas Schroeder, Jian Wang..(Mustes, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #18 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The initial pretrial conference scheduled for March 27, 2024, is ADJOURNED to April 10, 2024, at 4:10 P.M. The parties shall file their pre-conference materials by April 3, 2024. The parties are apprised that the initial pretrial conference typically is not adjourned based on the answer deadline. Initial Conference set for 4/10/2024 at 04:10 PM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 3/20/2024) (rro)
|
| Filing 18 LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Jennifer Mustes dated March 18, 2024. Document filed by Anamaria Bonilla, Gary Martens, Douglas Schroeder, Jian Wang..(Mustes, Jennifer) |
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Douglas Schroeder served on 3/7/2024, answer due 3/28/2024. Service was accepted by Belinda Randall, Manager of Administration. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Jian Wang served on 3/7/2024, answer due 3/28/2024. Service was accepted by Belinda Randall, Manager of Administration. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Anamaria Bonilla served on 3/7/2024, answer due 3/28/2024. Service was accepted by Belinda Randall, Manager of Administration. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Gary Martens served on 3/7/2024, answer due 3/28/2024. Service was accepted by Belinda Randall, Manager of Administration. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER: Initial Conference set for 3/27/2024 at 04:10 PM before Judge Lorna G. Schofield. The parties shall call (888) 363-4749 and enter the access code 558-3333. The telephonic conference is public, and the time of the conference is approximate, but the parties shall be ready to proceed by that time. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 2/14/2024) (vfr)
|
| Filing 12 COMPLAINT against Anamaria Bonilla, Gary Martens, Douglas Schroeder, Jian Wang. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jian Wang. (vf) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Gary Martens. (vf) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Douglas Schroeder. (vf) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT against Anamaria Bonilla. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Anamaria Bonilla. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Michael Howard Sussman. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Cause of Action code 28:451 Employment Discrimination; County code Albany; Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Cause of Action code has been modified to 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination); the County code has been modified to XX Out of State; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING REMOVAL OF PARTY. Notice to attorney Michael Howard Sussman. The following party/parties has been removed from this case: Elena Kraemer. The party was added to the case in error. (Duplicate Party) (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Michael Howard Sussman to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the All Defendant radio button was selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Lorna G. Schofield. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jian Wang, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Gary Martens, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Douglas Schroeder, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Anamaria Bonilla, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR -COMPLAINT against All Defendants. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28935071)Document filed by Elena Kraemer..(Sussman, Michael) Modified on 2/13/2024 (vf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
