Ramirez v. City Of New York et al
Plaintiff: Sally Ramirez
Defendant: City Of New York, S. Devi Jewram and John and Jane Doe
Case Number: 1:2024cv01061
Filed: February 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Arun Subramanian
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2024 Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. S. Devi Jewram served on 3/29/2024, answer due 5/24/2024. Service was accepted by Carmen Hernandez, Clerk. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Sally Ramirez..(Maduegbuna, Samuel)
April 2, 2024 Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. City Of New York served on 3/5/2024, answer due 5/24/2024. Service was accepted by A. Goebler, Legal Clerk. Document filed by Sally Ramirez..(Maduegbuna, Samuel)
March 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. By letter dated March 25, 2024, Defendant the City of New York requests an extension of time for all Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint. It is hereby ORDERED that the request is GRANTED. All Defendants shall answer or move by May 24, 2024. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 7. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, counsel for all parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on June 3, 2024, at 1:30 PM. The conference will take place via Microsoft Teams. The parties should dial in by calling (646) 453-4442 and entering the Phone Conference ID: 508 472 358, followed by the pound (#) sign. SO ORDERED. ( Initial Conference set for 6/3/2024 at 01:30 PM before Judge Arun Subramanian.), City Of New York answer due 5/24/2024; S. Devi Jewram answer due 5/24/2024; John and Jane Doe answer due 5/24/2024., Motions terminated: #7 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge Arun Subramanian from Desiree Alexander dated March 25, 2024. filed by City Of New York. (Signed by Judge Arun Subramanian on 3/26/2024) (vfr)
March 25, 2024 Filing 7 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the Complaint addressed to Judge Arun Subramanian from Desiree Alexander dated March 25, 2024. Document filed by City Of New York..(Alexander, Desiree)
February 14, 2024 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to S. Devi Jewram..(pc)
February 14, 2024 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to City Of New York..(pc)
February 14, 2024 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
February 14, 2024 Magistrate Judge Jennifer Willis is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
February 14, 2024 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Arun Subramanian. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
February 13, 2024 Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to S. Devi Jewram, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sally Ramirez..(Maduegbuna, Samuel)
February 13, 2024 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to City of New York, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sally Ramirez..(Maduegbuna, Samuel)
February 13, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Maduegbuna, Samuel)
February 13, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City Of New York, S. Devi Jewram, John and Jane Doe. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28943291)Document filed by Sally Ramirez..(Maduegbuna, Samuel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramirez v. City Of New York et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sally Ramirez
Represented By: Samuel Okwudili Maduegbuna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City Of New York
Represented By: Desiree Denise Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Devi Jewram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?