Wu v. Raufer
| Ting Wu |
| Susan Raufer |
| 1:2024cv01422 |
| February 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Mary Kay Vyskocil |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER. Document filed by Susan Raufer..(Ramirez-Fisher, Leslie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher on behalf of Susan Raufer..(Ramirez-Fisher, Leslie) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Susan Raufer served on 2/27/2024, answer due 4/29/2024. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Ting Wu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Receipt).(Torres, Alexa) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Susan Raufer..(jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Alexa Taiz Torres. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Susan Raufer. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (jgo) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Susan Raufer, re: #1 Complaint/Petition in the Nature of Mandamus. Document filed by Ting Wu..(Torres, Alexa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Torres, Alexa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Susan Raufer (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28991450).Document filed by Ting Wu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Tabs A-D).(Torres, Alexa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wu v. Raufer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ting Wu | |
| Represented By: | Alexa Taiz Torres |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Susan Raufer | |
| Represented By: | Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
