Humphrey et al v. The 3M Company et al
William Humphrey, Alex Isom, Samuel Jackson, Valerie Jenkins, Sneed Johnson, Floyd Lolly, Jacquelyn Jones, Brent Journeay, Angelo Joyce, David Kaufman, The Estate of Robert Kelley, Marlene Kenion, Eric Kerchen, Frank Lora, Connie Magee, Frank Maida, Katie Marshman, Kathryn Mills, William Moore, Jacqueline Morales, Barbara Morrisette, Chris Moss, Evan Munk and Jeffrey Noyes |
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation, Arkema Inc., Archroma U.S. Inc., Buckeye Fire Equipment Company, Chemdesign Products Inc., Chemguard Inc., Chemicals, Inc., Clariant Corporation, Corteva, Inc., Deepwater Chemicals, Inc., DuPont De Nemours Inc., Dynax Corporation, E. I. DuPont De Nemours and Company, Nation Ford Chemical Company, The Chemours Company,, The Chemours Company FC, LLC,, Tyco Fire Products, LP and Doe Defendants 1-20 |
1:2024cv01455 |
February 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Katherine Polk Failla |
Tort Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Received e-mail from the United States District Court - District of South Carolina acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 2:24-cv-01595, filed on 03/29/2024. (sgz) |
Filing 4 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER OUT ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL...transferring this action from the U.S.D.C. - S.D.N.Y to the United States District Court - District of South Carolina. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/25/2024) (vba) |
MDL TRANSFER OUT ELECTRONICALLY: to the United States District Court - District of South Carolina.(vba) |
Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Katherine Polk Failla. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Notice of Removal and Civil Cover Sheet served on All Parties on 2/26/2024. Document filed by Chemguard Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP(individually), Tyco Fire Products, LP(as successor in interest to The Ansul Company)..(Herten, Thomas) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Herten, Thomas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 162439/2023. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-28997570).Document filed by Chemguard Inc., Tyco Fire Products, LP(individually), Tyco Fire Products, LP(as successor in interest to The Ansul Company). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - NY State Court Complaint).(Herten, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.