Dixon v. U.S. Attorney Office
| Demark Dixon |
| U.S. Attorney Office |
| 1:2024cv01519 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Demark Dixon 273 East 239th Street Apt. #3D Bronx, NY 10470. (sha) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: On March 18, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw this action. (ECF 3.) The Court grants Plaintiff's motion. The Court dismisses this action without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED., Motions terminated: #3 MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Demark Dixon. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/21/2024) (rro)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION TO WITHDRAW ACTION. Document filed by Demark Dixon..(rro) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 2. Mailed to: Demark Dixon 273 East 239th Street Apt. #3D Bronx, NY 10470. (sac) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR IFP APPLICATION. Within 30 days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $405.00 in fees or complete, sign, and submit the attached IFP application. If Plaintiff submits the IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 1:24-CV-1519 (LTS). If the Court grants the IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 1915(a)(1). No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, this action will be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, this action will be dismissed. To the extent that Plaintiff brings this civil action seeking error coram nobis relief challenging his criminal conviction in United States v. Dixon, 7:97-CR-0498-08 (S.D.N.Y.), he may file a written request to withdraw this civil action, and file a motion for error coram nobis relief in the criminal action without paying fees or submitting an IFP application. See Doe v. United States, 915 F.3d 905, 909 (2d Cir. 2019) ("A writ of error coram nobis is an extraordinary remedy typically granted only when a prisoner is out of custody and so cannot pursue habeas relief.") (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also United States v. Denedo, 556 U.S. 904, 912-13 (2009) ("Because coram nobis is but an extraordinary tool to correct a legal or factual error, an application for the writ is properly viewed as a belated extension of the original proceeding during which the error allegedly transpired."); United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502, 505 n.4 (1954) (An error coram nobis "motion is a step in the criminal case and not, like habeas corpus where relief is sought in a separate case and record, the beginning of a separate civil Proceeding."); cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(e) (writ of error coram nobis abolished as to federal civil actions); Morgan, 346 U.S. at 505 n.4 (noting the same). The Court certifies, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/4/24) (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (yv)
|
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Attorney Office. Document filed by Demark Dixon. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dixon v. U.S. Attorney Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Demark Dixon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: U.S. Attorney Office | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
