Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Jamar Davis |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons and Florence High |
| 1:2024cv01538 |
| February 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Richard M Berman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of District of Colorado. (sac) |
| Received e-mail from the United States District Court - District of Colorado acknowledging receipt of transferred case. Assigned Case Number: 1:24-cv-00614, filed on 3/6/2024. (rju) |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge Richard M. Berman. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(tro) |
| Filing 2 LETTER by USA as to Jamar Davis addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman from AUSA Frank Balsamello dated January 4, 2024 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Document filed by USA. (sac) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. Document filed by Jamar Davis. (sac) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/29/2024: #1 Order [16-cr-339 (RMB)]) (sac). (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/29/2024) (sac). |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
