Lopez v. Eventbrite, Inc. et al
Robert G. Lopez |
Eventbrite, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc. and John Does 1-3 |
1:2024cv01544 |
February 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Stewart D Aaron |
Gregory H Woods |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 18. Mailed to: Robert G. Lopez 210 Stanton Street #218 New York, NY 10002. (sha) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 20. Mailed to: Robert G. Lopez 210 Stanton Street #218 New York, NY 10002. (sac) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting #19 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #19 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to First Amended Complaint addressed to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron from Vijay K. Toke dated April 25, 2024. Defendant Eventbrite's letter motion (ECF No. 19), with Plaintiff's consent, is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant Eventbrite to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is extended until June 6, 2024. Eventbrite, Inc. answer due 6/6/2024. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 4/25/2024) (kl) |
Filing 19 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to First Amended Complaint addressed to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron from Vijay K. Toke dated April 25, 2024. Document filed by Eventbrite, Inc...(Toke, Vijay) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Meta's letter motion (ECF No. 17), with Plaintiff's consent, is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant Meta to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is extended until June 6, 2024. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 4/25/2024) (mml) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Meta Platforms, Inc. answer due 6/6/2024. (mml) |
Filing 17 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Amended Complaint addressed to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron from Caroline K. Simons dated April 24, 2024. Document filed by Meta Platforms, Inc...(Simons, Caroline) |
Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #1 Complaint against Eventbrite, Inc., John Does 1-3, Meta Platforms, Inc. with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Robert G. Lopez. Related document: #1 Complaint..(rro) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 15. Mailed to: Robert G. Lopez 210 Stanton Street #218 New York, NY 10002. (sha) |
Filing 15 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #14 Motion for Vijay K. Toke to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 4/10/2024) (va) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Vijay K. Toke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Eventbrite, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit and Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order).(Schwimmer, Martin) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #14 MOTION for Vijay K. Toke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bc) |
Filing 13 LETTER addressed to Judge Gregory H. Woods from Martin B. Schwimmer dated April 8, 2024 re: Dkt. 9, order regarding assignment to a magistrate. Document filed by Eventbrite, Inc...(Schwimmer, Martin) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #11 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron from Martin B. Schwimmer dated March 28, 2024. Defendant Eventbrite's letter motion (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant Eventbrite to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended until April 25, 2024. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 3/28/2024) Eventbrite, Inc. answer due 4/25/2024 (ks) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 9, 12. Mailed to: Robert G. Lopez 210 Stanton Street #218 New York, NY 10002. (jwh) |
>>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #10 MOTION for Vijay K. Toke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29141087. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of California 415-865-7000; Ink signature on motion required. Re-file the motion as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. (sgz) |
Filing 11 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron from Martin B. Schwimmer dated March 28, 2024. Document filed by Eventbrite, Inc...(Schwimmer, Martin) |
Filing 10 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Vijay K. Toke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-29141087. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Eventbrite, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit and Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order).(Schwimmer, Martin) Modified on 3/28/2024 (sgz). |
Filing 9 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If both parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for the defendant must, within two weeks of the date of this order file on ECF a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this order (and also available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf). The executed form should be filed on ECF as a "Proposed Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge," and be described using the "Proposed Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge" filing event in accordance with ECF Rule 13.27. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. Any appeal would be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered. If either party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks of the date of this order advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/27/2024) (rro) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Martin Bernard Schwimmer on behalf of Eventbrite, Inc...(Schwimmer, Martin) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of METAs Letter Request for a 30-day Extension and Notice of Appearance of Caroline K. Simons served on Robert G. Lopez on 3/22/2024. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Meta Platforms, Inc...(Simons, Caroline) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 6. Mailed to: Robert G. Lopez 210 Stanton Street #218 New York, NY 10002. (sha) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Meta's letter motion (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. The deadline for Defendant Meta to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, with Plaintiff's consent, is extended until April 25, 2024. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 3/21/2024) (va) |
Filing 5 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint addressed to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron from Caroline K. Simons dated March 21, 2024. Document filed by Meta Platforms, Inc...(Simons, Caroline) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Caroline Koo Simons on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc...(Simons, Caroline) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Meta Platforms, Inc. answer due 4/25/2024. (va) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Eventbrite, Inc. served on 3/8/2024, answer due 3/29/2024. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky as NYDOS Process Receiving Specialist. Document filed by Robert G. Lopez. (sc) |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 2. Mailed to: Robert G. Lopez 210 Stanton Street #218 New York, NY 10002. (vn) |
Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) and Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation) and All such motions. Referred to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/5/2024) (rro) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eventbrite, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number 26891)Document filed by Robert G. Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt).(rdz) |
Case Designated ECF. (rdz) |
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (rdz) |
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Eventbrite, Inc., Meta Platforms, Inc...(rdz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.