Doncouse v. LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC et al
Plaintiff: Graciela Doncouse
Defendant: LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC and Rosebud Realty, LLC
Case Number: 1:2024cv02189
Filed: March 22, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2024 Filing 13 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #10 Stipulation and Order,,,, Terminate Motions,,, #1 Complaint, Set/Reset Deadlines to extend time to appear/answer on consent addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Frederick Sung dated May 20, 2024. Document filed by LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC..(Sung, Frederick)
April 15, 2024 Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. Rosebud Realty, LLC served on 4/8/2024, answer due 5/21/2024. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, legal clerk. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly)
April 15, 2024 Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE. LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC served on 4/8/2024, answer due 5/21/2024. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky, legal clerk. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly)
April 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the parties herein, that the time for Defendant, L'Antica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended to May 21, 2024. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this Stipulation may be executed in counterparts, and when taken together, shall constitute one original document and any signatures transmitted via facsimile or other electronic means may be deemed an original. SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: #9 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint to answer or otherwise respond to Complaint.CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint to answer or otherwise respond to Complaint. filed by LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 4/11/2024) (ate)
April 11, 2024 Set/Reset Deadlines: LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC answer due 5/21/2024; Rosebud Realty, LLC answer due 5/21/2024. (ate)
April 10, 2024 Filing 9 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint to answer or otherwise respond to Complaint., CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint to answer or otherwise respond to Complaint.( Return Date set for 4/11/2024 at 10:00 AM.) Document filed by LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC..(Sung, Frederick)
March 29, 2024 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of true copies of Judge Analisa Torres's March 26, 2024 Order [Dk. 7] and Judge Torress Individual Part Rules served on LAntica Pizzeria Da Michelle NY LLC and Rosebud Realty, LLC on March 29, 2024. Service was made by MAIL. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly)
March 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by May 27, 2024, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. 2. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED TO IMMEDIATELY SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND THE COURT'S INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES TO ALL PARTIES, as further set forth herein. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/26/2024) (mml)
March 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b) (5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/26/2024) (ks)
March 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, as further set forth. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 3/26/2024) (mml)
March 25, 2024 Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC, Rosebud Realty, LLC..(gp)
March 25, 2024 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp)
March 25, 2024 Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp)
March 25, 2024 Case Designated ECF. (gp)
March 22, 2024 Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to LANTICA PIZZERIA DA MICHELE NYC LLC AND ROSEBUD REALTY, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly)
March 22, 2024 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Marks, Bradly)
March 22, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC, Rosebud Realty, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29121036)Document filed by Graciela Doncouse..(Marks, Bradly)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doncouse v. LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Graciela Doncouse
Represented By: Bradly G. Marks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAntica Pizzeria Da Michele NYC LLC
Represented By: Frederick C Sung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosebud Realty, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?