Schoch v. Scattaretico-Naber et al
| James A. Schoch |
| Judge Mary Anne Scattaretico-Naber, Shari Rackman, David Peck and Jennifer Demers |
| 1:2024cv02294 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jennifer H Rearden |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER M10-468: To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a party's obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information. Parties may consent to electronic service to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for permission to file documents electronically. Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the court's website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the courts electronic docket. A notice directing the partys attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the court's records. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/18/2024) (sac)
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE CONSENT TO RECEIVE ELECTRONIC SERVICE. The following party: James A. Schoch consents to receive electronic service via the ECF system. Document filed by James A. Schoch. (sac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jennifer Demers, David Peck, Shari Rackman, Mary Anne Scattaretico-Naber. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number 27823)Document filed by James A. Schoch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Fee Paid Receipt) (sac) |
| Magistrate Judge Gary Stein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sac) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jennifer Demers, David Peck, Shari Rackman, Mary Anne Scattaretico-Naber. (sac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
