Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd. v. Shenzhen Yili Technology Co., Ltd. et al
Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd. |
Shenzhen Yili Technology Co., Ltd. and Hui Li |
1:2024cv03023 |
April 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Shenzhen Yili Technology Co., Ltd. and Hui Li, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd...(Zhu, Kai) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd...(Zhu, Kai) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Zhu, Kai) |
Filing 2 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review..(Zhu, Kai) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hui Li, Shenzhen Yili Technology Co., Ltd.. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29248576)Document filed by Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DMCA Counternotice, #2 Exhibit Copyright Registration, #3 Exhibit Copyright License Agreement, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Product, #5 Exhibit Infringing Product).(Zhu, Kai) |
***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 6 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. Correct case 24cv3024. (db) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.